Benedict Efeturi - News Proof

News:

Politics

Benedict Efeturi


Showing posts with label Benedict Efeturi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benedict Efeturi. Show all posts

Senate Rule Forgery: FG Drops Criminal Charges Against Saraki, Ekweremadu

Senate Rule Forgery: FG Drops Criminal Charges Against Saraki, Ekweremadu

saraki ike ekweremadu
The Federal Government of Nigeria has filed a motion to withdraw the charge of criminal conspiracy against Senate President Bukola Saraki and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu.

Four months ago, government, through the Ministry of Justice, arraigned Saraki, Ekweremadu, alongside former Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasu, and his deputy, Benedict Efeturi.

The four were accused of conspiracy and forgery of Senate Standing Rules which brought Saraki and Ekweremadu to office in 2015.

The suit was filed in June, almost a year after Secretary of Senate Unity Forum, Senator Suleiman Hunkuyi petitioned the Inspector General of Police where he demanded criminal investigation into allegation of forgery of Senate Rules used for the elections of presiding officers on June 9, 2015.


They were brought before Justice Yusuf Halilu.

In a new twist, an affidavit in support of the motion was filed before the High Court of Federal Capital Territory, yesterday, by a litigation officer from the Federal Ministry of Justice, Odubu Loveme.

Saraki and Ekweremadu, as well as Maikasuwa, and  Efeturi, were first arraigned before Justice Yusuf Halilu on June 10, 2016 via charge No. CR/219/16.

They all pleaded not guilty on July 27, 2016.

In the motion, Loveme said counsel to the federal government on the matter, Aliyu Umar, a senior advocate of Nigeria, on September 30, in the office of the Director of Public Prosecution told him that he had studied the case diary and “ had decided to amend the charge in the manner stated on the face of the motion paper.” Loveme added that he has, consequently, filed an amended charge.

“That I depose to this affidavit in good faith believing same to be correct to the best of my knowledge and information and in accordance with the Oaths Act Cap 01 laws of the Federation of Nigeria,” he said.

Based on the amended charge, only Messrs. Maikasuwa and Efeturi would face prosecution.

The two officials are accused of fraudulently amending the 2015 Senate Standing Orders without the authority of the 7th Senate “ with intention that the Senators elect of the 8th Senate would believe that the said Senate Standing Orders 2015 ( as amended) was made by the authority of the 7th Senate of the Federal republic of Nigeria.”

They are also accused of forging a document punishable under section 366 of the Penal Code Act ( Northern States) Federal Provisions Act, 1960, Cap 345, Laws of the Federation 1990 ( as amended). The Nigerian Government also accused them of giving false information with the intention to mislead the public. The court had, on September 28 adjourned the matter to Friday, October 7 for commencement of hearing.

Umar, in his written address in support of the motion to amend the charge on Thursday, stated that the sole issue for determination is “ whether the Court can permit the amendment of the charge in terms of the amended charge”.

He said the Court has the powers to permit the amendment based on the provisions of Section 216 (1) of the Administration o Criminal Justice Act.

The Section stated that “ A Court may permit an alteration or an amendment to a charge or framing of a new charge at any time before judgment is pronounced.”

He also quoted Section 216 (3) which states that “ Where a Defendant is arraigned for trial on an imperfect or erroneous charge ,the Court may permit or direct the framing of a new charge, or any amendment to, or the alteration of the original charge.”

saraki ike ekweremadu
The Federal Government of Nigeria has filed a motion to withdraw the charge of criminal conspiracy against Senate President Bukola Saraki and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu.

Four months ago, government, through the Ministry of Justice, arraigned Saraki, Ekweremadu, alongside former Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasu, and his deputy, Benedict Efeturi.

The four were accused of conspiracy and forgery of Senate Standing Rules which brought Saraki and Ekweremadu to office in 2015.

The suit was filed in June, almost a year after Secretary of Senate Unity Forum, Senator Suleiman Hunkuyi petitioned the Inspector General of Police where he demanded criminal investigation into allegation of forgery of Senate Rules used for the elections of presiding officers on June 9, 2015.


They were brought before Justice Yusuf Halilu.

In a new twist, an affidavit in support of the motion was filed before the High Court of Federal Capital Territory, yesterday, by a litigation officer from the Federal Ministry of Justice, Odubu Loveme.

Saraki and Ekweremadu, as well as Maikasuwa, and  Efeturi, were first arraigned before Justice Yusuf Halilu on June 10, 2016 via charge No. CR/219/16.

They all pleaded not guilty on July 27, 2016.

In the motion, Loveme said counsel to the federal government on the matter, Aliyu Umar, a senior advocate of Nigeria, on September 30, in the office of the Director of Public Prosecution told him that he had studied the case diary and “ had decided to amend the charge in the manner stated on the face of the motion paper.” Loveme added that he has, consequently, filed an amended charge.

“That I depose to this affidavit in good faith believing same to be correct to the best of my knowledge and information and in accordance with the Oaths Act Cap 01 laws of the Federation of Nigeria,” he said.

Based on the amended charge, only Messrs. Maikasuwa and Efeturi would face prosecution.

The two officials are accused of fraudulently amending the 2015 Senate Standing Orders without the authority of the 7th Senate “ with intention that the Senators elect of the 8th Senate would believe that the said Senate Standing Orders 2015 ( as amended) was made by the authority of the 7th Senate of the Federal republic of Nigeria.”

They are also accused of forging a document punishable under section 366 of the Penal Code Act ( Northern States) Federal Provisions Act, 1960, Cap 345, Laws of the Federation 1990 ( as amended). The Nigerian Government also accused them of giving false information with the intention to mislead the public. The court had, on September 28 adjourned the matter to Friday, October 7 for commencement of hearing.

Umar, in his written address in support of the motion to amend the charge on Thursday, stated that the sole issue for determination is “ whether the Court can permit the amendment of the charge in terms of the amended charge”.

He said the Court has the powers to permit the amendment based on the provisions of Section 216 (1) of the Administration o Criminal Justice Act.

The Section stated that “ A Court may permit an alteration or an amendment to a charge or framing of a new charge at any time before judgment is pronounced.”

He also quoted Section 216 (3) which states that “ Where a Defendant is arraigned for trial on an imperfect or erroneous charge ,the Court may permit or direct the framing of a new charge, or any amendment to, or the alteration of the original charge.”

Updates: Saraki, Ekweremadu's Forgery Trial Today At The Court

Updates: Saraki, Ekweremadu's Forgery Trial Today At The Court

The trial of President of the Senate, Bukola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and others at an Abuja Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High court sitting in Jabi was on Monday stalled due to the ongoing vacation of judicial workers.

Saraki, Ekweremadu, former clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa and the Deputy clerk, Benedict Efeturi are facing two count charges of alleged criminal conspiracy and forgery of the senate standing rule‎s, 2015, which was leveled against them by the Federal Government.

Saraki, Ekweremadu and the other accused persons who arrived the court earlier had to return back after been told of the break.

Recall that the Justice Yusuf Halilu -led court had on June 27 granted all accused persons bail after they pleaded not guilty to the two-count charge.

However, the court could not sit today because the judiciary was on vacation, which is expected to last till September.

A registrar of the court who confided in our source, said the matter will not be heard today because the court is on recess.

The source said, “As you can see, the accused persons just arrived but the matter will not be coming up today because the court is on recess.”

On when the matter will be coming up, the source said, “The accused persons will come back later for a date on when the trial will resume but that will be after the judicial vacation which will end sometime in September.”

The court has fixed September 28, 2016 for the continuation of trials.


The trial of President of the Senate, Bukola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and others at an Abuja Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High court sitting in Jabi was on Monday stalled due to the ongoing vacation of judicial workers.

Saraki, Ekweremadu, former clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa and the Deputy clerk, Benedict Efeturi are facing two count charges of alleged criminal conspiracy and forgery of the senate standing rule‎s, 2015, which was leveled against them by the Federal Government.

Saraki, Ekweremadu and the other accused persons who arrived the court earlier had to return back after been told of the break.

Recall that the Justice Yusuf Halilu -led court had on June 27 granted all accused persons bail after they pleaded not guilty to the two-count charge.

However, the court could not sit today because the judiciary was on vacation, which is expected to last till September.

A registrar of the court who confided in our source, said the matter will not be heard today because the court is on recess.

The source said, “As you can see, the accused persons just arrived but the matter will not be coming up today because the court is on recess.”

On when the matter will be coming up, the source said, “The accused persons will come back later for a date on when the trial will resume but that will be after the judicial vacation which will end sometime in September.”

The court has fixed September 28, 2016 for the continuation of trials.


FG Refuses To Doze On Saraki, Unleashes 80 Specially Trained Lawyers On Him, Ekweremadu Over Forgery Suit

FG Refuses To Doze On Saraki, Unleashes 80 Specially Trained Lawyers On Him, Ekweremadu Over Forgery Suit

Bukola saraki
The federal Government through the Ministry of Justice has resolved to mobilise 80 specially trained lawyers to handle the forgery case filed against the embattled President of the Nigerian Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki, his Deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and two others who have been sued over alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rule, Punch Newspaper reports

The identities of the lawyers, who were said to have been specially trained for the tasks ahead, have not been made known.

It was learnt that the Prof. Itse Sagay-led Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption was involved in the training of the special prosecutors.

Our correspondent gathered that the training, which ended in June, lasted for over one month.

Sources in the Federal Ministry of Justice in Abuja confirmed on Thursday, according to Punch Newspaper that one of the teams of prosecutors had been assigned the forgery case recently instituted against Senate President Bukola Saraki; his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, and two others.

According to Punch Newspaper, the Federal Government has set up 20 teams of prosecutors, comprising 80 lawyers, who will handle a number of high profile criminal cases investigated by law enforcement agencies, including the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

Each of the teams, according o Punch Newspaper had four lawyers with a Senior Advocate of Nigeria as the leader.

The new prosecuting team will fully take over the forgery case from the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Mr. Mohammed Diri, when the trial resumes on Monday, our source says

The Federal Government, through the office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minster of Justice, had, on June 10, preferred against Saraki, Ekweremadu and others, two counts of criminal conspiracy and forgery of Senate Standing Rules used for the leadership election of the presiding officers of the 8th Senate on June 4, 2015.

The two other co-accused persons are a former Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa, and his then deputy, Benedict Efeturi.

The Federal Government stated that the offence of conspiracy is punishable under Section 97 (1) of the Penal Code Act and offence of forgery with “fraudulent intent” punishable under Section 364 of the same law.

On June 27, the four accused persons were arraigned and they pleaded not guilty to the charges before Justice Yusuf Halilu of a Federal Capital Territory High Court in Jabi, Abuja.

Shortly after their arraignment on June 27, they were granted bail on the conditions that each of them should produce two sureties, who must have property either in Asokoro, Maitama, Wuse 2 or Garki (all in Abuja).

Sources confirmed to our correspondent on Thursday that the AGF and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, deliberately assigned the case to the special prosecution team for “efficient prosecution and management of the case”.

It was learnt that the team was given the liberty by the AGF to review the case file “and make necessary adjustments or amendments” where necessary to enhance the prospect of a successful prosecution of the case.

When contacted, the AGF’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Mr. Salihu Isah, confirmed to our correspondent that the forgery case was one of the high-profile criminal cases that had been assigned to one of the special teams of prosecutors.

“The prosecutors, 80 in all, are constituted into 20 teams. After they were trained, cases have been assigned to the first six and one of the cases is the Saraki’s case that you mentioned,” Isah said.

Though he declined to mention the names of the lawyers in the team, Isah said the matters assigned to the various teams varied from terrorism to corruption cases, among others.

According to him, the National Prosecution Coordination Committee, inaugurated by Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, would review some of the cases either being prosecuted or still being investigated by the EFCC, the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission and others agencies.

The committee, he added, would also recommend the re-assignment of suitable cases among them to the teams of prosecutors.

“The teams will take up cases investigated by the various law enforcement agencies – ICPC, EFCC, DSS – and even some being handled by the ministry,” he said.

A source explained that some of the cases that would be assigned to the teams of prosecutors were the over 1,500 terrorism cases said to have been filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja since last year while the accused persons had yet to be arraigned.
Bukola saraki
The federal Government through the Ministry of Justice has resolved to mobilise 80 specially trained lawyers to handle the forgery case filed against the embattled President of the Nigerian Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki, his Deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and two others who have been sued over alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rule, Punch Newspaper reports

The identities of the lawyers, who were said to have been specially trained for the tasks ahead, have not been made known.

It was learnt that the Prof. Itse Sagay-led Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption was involved in the training of the special prosecutors.

Our correspondent gathered that the training, which ended in June, lasted for over one month.

Sources in the Federal Ministry of Justice in Abuja confirmed on Thursday, according to Punch Newspaper that one of the teams of prosecutors had been assigned the forgery case recently instituted against Senate President Bukola Saraki; his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, and two others.

According to Punch Newspaper, the Federal Government has set up 20 teams of prosecutors, comprising 80 lawyers, who will handle a number of high profile criminal cases investigated by law enforcement agencies, including the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

Each of the teams, according o Punch Newspaper had four lawyers with a Senior Advocate of Nigeria as the leader.

The new prosecuting team will fully take over the forgery case from the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Mr. Mohammed Diri, when the trial resumes on Monday, our source says

The Federal Government, through the office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minster of Justice, had, on June 10, preferred against Saraki, Ekweremadu and others, two counts of criminal conspiracy and forgery of Senate Standing Rules used for the leadership election of the presiding officers of the 8th Senate on June 4, 2015.

The two other co-accused persons are a former Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa, and his then deputy, Benedict Efeturi.

The Federal Government stated that the offence of conspiracy is punishable under Section 97 (1) of the Penal Code Act and offence of forgery with “fraudulent intent” punishable under Section 364 of the same law.

On June 27, the four accused persons were arraigned and they pleaded not guilty to the charges before Justice Yusuf Halilu of a Federal Capital Territory High Court in Jabi, Abuja.

Shortly after their arraignment on June 27, they were granted bail on the conditions that each of them should produce two sureties, who must have property either in Asokoro, Maitama, Wuse 2 or Garki (all in Abuja).

Sources confirmed to our correspondent on Thursday that the AGF and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, deliberately assigned the case to the special prosecution team for “efficient prosecution and management of the case”.

It was learnt that the team was given the liberty by the AGF to review the case file “and make necessary adjustments or amendments” where necessary to enhance the prospect of a successful prosecution of the case.

When contacted, the AGF’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Mr. Salihu Isah, confirmed to our correspondent that the forgery case was one of the high-profile criminal cases that had been assigned to one of the special teams of prosecutors.

“The prosecutors, 80 in all, are constituted into 20 teams. After they were trained, cases have been assigned to the first six and one of the cases is the Saraki’s case that you mentioned,” Isah said.

Though he declined to mention the names of the lawyers in the team, Isah said the matters assigned to the various teams varied from terrorism to corruption cases, among others.

According to him, the National Prosecution Coordination Committee, inaugurated by Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, would review some of the cases either being prosecuted or still being investigated by the EFCC, the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission and others agencies.

The committee, he added, would also recommend the re-assignment of suitable cases among them to the teams of prosecutors.

“The teams will take up cases investigated by the various law enforcement agencies – ICPC, EFCC, DSS – and even some being handled by the ministry,” he said.

A source explained that some of the cases that would be assigned to the teams of prosecutors were the over 1,500 terrorism cases said to have been filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja since last year while the accused persons had yet to be arraigned.

How We Used 'Doctored' Standing Orders For Saraki, Ekweremadu; David Mark Ordered - Deputy Clerk Reveals

How We Used 'Doctored' Standing Orders For Saraki, Ekweremadu; David Mark Ordered - Deputy Clerk Reveals

In an exclusive report, the deputy clerk of the National Assembly has confirmed to police investigators that the senate's standing orders used for the 2015 elections of Saraki and Ekweremadu as president and deputy, were indeed different.

Speaking with the Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Department of the Nigerian Police Force, the deputy clerk of the National Assembly, Benedict Efeturi, has disclosed to the investigators that the senate’s standing orders used for the 2015 elections of Bukola Saraki and Ike Ekweremadu as senate president and deputy respectively, was different from the 2011 version.

Efeturi who made the disclosure in the heat of the allegations that the rules were forged to help the lawmakers, said the alteration, which some senators denounced as illegal as lawmakers were not informed about, was based on the directive of the former senate leadership, led by its president, David Mark.

He said the amendment was done “by convention and practice” and not be “procedure”, as previous versions of the rules were amended by the same method.

In his statement to the police, Efeturi, who is also the Clerk of the Senate, said the leadership of the 7th Senate under David Mark ordered the 2015 Standing Rules be amended “not necessarily by procedure” but “by convention and practice”.

According to the report, he “stated that the leadership of the National Assembly of the 7th Senate ordered the 2015 Standing Rules as amended by their convention and practice. (He stated) that the Senate Standing Orders 2003, 2007 and 2011 followed the same procedure as that of 2015. He emphasized that in the Parliament, amendment of the Standing Orders is by practice not necessarily by procedure.

“He further stated that during the ruling of the Senate President on the 24th of June 2015, that the Senate Standing Orders of the Senate 2015 is authentic, final, relevant and cannot be challenged. He attached a copy of the debates of the Senate on Wednesday, the 24th of June where the Senate President ruled (that) the Senate Standing Order 2015 as authentic Standing Orders of the 8th Senate.”

Meanwhile, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa, the Clerk to the National Assembly, who conducted the elections of Saraki and Ekweremadu, said he did not refer to any Senate Standing Rules, rather, he said he only performed his duty using “normal procedures for the opening of a new parliament”.

He said, according to the police report, “that before the election, he called on the Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly who is also the Clerk to the Senate to read out the guidelines for the election”.

He denied knowledge of the existence or production of an amended Senate Standing Rules 2015, saying he had no business in the daily activities in the Senate, and told the police Efeturi was “in better position to know of the 2015 Standing Orders as amended”.

The report says a number of Senators, including Suleiman Hukunyi, Kabiru Marafa, Ahmed Lawan, Abdullahi Gumel, Gbenga Ashafa, Robert Boroffice and Abu Ibrahim, were invited during the investigation.

In their separate statements, they said the 7th Senate did not amend the 2011 Standing Rules and thus, the amendment rules used for inauguration of the eighth assembly was fraudulent since there was no compliance with the requirements for amendment of Senate Rules.

Senator Faruk Lawan who contested and lost the senate presidency to Saraki, said, “The procedures for election into the two presiding offices are clearly stipulated in Order 2 (2(i) of the Senate Standing Rules 2011. That contrary to the provision of the above order, the Clerk to the National Assembly introduced and used order 3(3) e (ii) of the purported 2015 Standing Order”.

The report also noted the submissions of some former lawmakers like Ita Enang, who was chairman, Rules and Business in the seventh senate, told the police that the previous Senate did not amend the rules.

Meanwhile Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu's spokesperson, Uche Anichukwu, told Premium Times that only All Progressives Congress Senators in the Unity Forum - a group opposed to the election of Saraki - were invited for questioning. He queried the basis for his arraignment as he was neither questioned nor indicted by the police.

In the summary, the police’s CIID said the contents of the 2015 Rules “are substantially different from the Senate Standing Order 2011 as amended” and that “Sections 2(iv), 3(3)EI,ii,iii,G and H, 5 and 7 of the Rules are different in the two Orders”.

“The allusion of the Clerk of the Senate to procedure of amending the Standing Orders of the Parliament through ‘practice and not necessarily procedure’ is a misplaced analogy and undemocratic because the Nigerian Senate has clearly laid down without a proviso, the procedure to be adopted in amending its standing orders as contained in the section 110 of 2011 Senate Standing Orders.

“This practice where some group of senators amend the Rules of the Senate without following legal procedures is not only criminal but portends danger for growing democracy,” the Police said.

The report, dated July 14, 2015, was forwarded to the Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, to determine “if this conduct constitutes crime or should be treated as an internal affairs of the Senate”.



In an exclusive report, the deputy clerk of the National Assembly has confirmed to police investigators that the senate's standing orders used for the 2015 elections of Saraki and Ekweremadu as president and deputy, were indeed different.

Speaking with the Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Department of the Nigerian Police Force, the deputy clerk of the National Assembly, Benedict Efeturi, has disclosed to the investigators that the senate’s standing orders used for the 2015 elections of Bukola Saraki and Ike Ekweremadu as senate president and deputy respectively, was different from the 2011 version.

Efeturi who made the disclosure in the heat of the allegations that the rules were forged to help the lawmakers, said the alteration, which some senators denounced as illegal as lawmakers were not informed about, was based on the directive of the former senate leadership, led by its president, David Mark.

He said the amendment was done “by convention and practice” and not be “procedure”, as previous versions of the rules were amended by the same method.

In his statement to the police, Efeturi, who is also the Clerk of the Senate, said the leadership of the 7th Senate under David Mark ordered the 2015 Standing Rules be amended “not necessarily by procedure” but “by convention and practice”.

According to the report, he “stated that the leadership of the National Assembly of the 7th Senate ordered the 2015 Standing Rules as amended by their convention and practice. (He stated) that the Senate Standing Orders 2003, 2007 and 2011 followed the same procedure as that of 2015. He emphasized that in the Parliament, amendment of the Standing Orders is by practice not necessarily by procedure.

“He further stated that during the ruling of the Senate President on the 24th of June 2015, that the Senate Standing Orders of the Senate 2015 is authentic, final, relevant and cannot be challenged. He attached a copy of the debates of the Senate on Wednesday, the 24th of June where the Senate President ruled (that) the Senate Standing Order 2015 as authentic Standing Orders of the 8th Senate.”

Meanwhile, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa, the Clerk to the National Assembly, who conducted the elections of Saraki and Ekweremadu, said he did not refer to any Senate Standing Rules, rather, he said he only performed his duty using “normal procedures for the opening of a new parliament”.

He said, according to the police report, “that before the election, he called on the Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly who is also the Clerk to the Senate to read out the guidelines for the election”.

He denied knowledge of the existence or production of an amended Senate Standing Rules 2015, saying he had no business in the daily activities in the Senate, and told the police Efeturi was “in better position to know of the 2015 Standing Orders as amended”.

The report says a number of Senators, including Suleiman Hukunyi, Kabiru Marafa, Ahmed Lawan, Abdullahi Gumel, Gbenga Ashafa, Robert Boroffice and Abu Ibrahim, were invited during the investigation.

In their separate statements, they said the 7th Senate did not amend the 2011 Standing Rules and thus, the amendment rules used for inauguration of the eighth assembly was fraudulent since there was no compliance with the requirements for amendment of Senate Rules.

Senator Faruk Lawan who contested and lost the senate presidency to Saraki, said, “The procedures for election into the two presiding offices are clearly stipulated in Order 2 (2(i) of the Senate Standing Rules 2011. That contrary to the provision of the above order, the Clerk to the National Assembly introduced and used order 3(3) e (ii) of the purported 2015 Standing Order”.

The report also noted the submissions of some former lawmakers like Ita Enang, who was chairman, Rules and Business in the seventh senate, told the police that the previous Senate did not amend the rules.

Meanwhile Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu's spokesperson, Uche Anichukwu, told Premium Times that only All Progressives Congress Senators in the Unity Forum - a group opposed to the election of Saraki - were invited for questioning. He queried the basis for his arraignment as he was neither questioned nor indicted by the police.

In the summary, the police’s CIID said the contents of the 2015 Rules “are substantially different from the Senate Standing Order 2011 as amended” and that “Sections 2(iv), 3(3)EI,ii,iii,G and H, 5 and 7 of the Rules are different in the two Orders”.

“The allusion of the Clerk of the Senate to procedure of amending the Standing Orders of the Parliament through ‘practice and not necessarily procedure’ is a misplaced analogy and undemocratic because the Nigerian Senate has clearly laid down without a proviso, the procedure to be adopted in amending its standing orders as contained in the section 110 of 2011 Senate Standing Orders.

“This practice where some group of senators amend the Rules of the Senate without following legal procedures is not only criminal but portends danger for growing democracy,” the Police said.

The report, dated July 14, 2015, was forwarded to the Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, to determine “if this conduct constitutes crime or should be treated as an internal affairs of the Senate”.



BREAKING: Saraki, Ekweremadu, Others Granted Bail

BREAKING: Saraki, Ekweremadu, Others Granted Bail

Justice Yusuf Halilu of a Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court, Abuja on Monday granted the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, former clerk of the National Assembly, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa bail.
Saraki, Ekweremadu, former clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa and the Deputy Clerk, Benedict Efeturi are facing charges of alleged criminal conspiracy and forgery of the senate standing rule‎s, 2015. The charges were brought against them by the Federal Government.

The prosecutor, Joseph Daodu had filed an application before the Halilu-led court seeking that the accused persons be denied bail because they may tamper with the course of investigation and may likely jump bail.


But counsel to the first accused person, Salisu Maikasuwa, Ikechukwu Ezechukwu argued that there was need to admit his client bail because his client conducted himself properly all through the investigation.

He said, “All through his investigation, he was never detained, and he also made himself available for investigation.”

Ezechukwu urged the court to dismiss the application of the prosecution and grant his client bail on self recognition.

Counsel to the 3rd defendant, the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, Paul Erokoro, SAN, contended that the affidavits filed by the prosecution “never made mention of Saraki and the police in the course of its investigation and the police never invited him for questioning.


“It’s a fact that my client who has being standing trial at the CCT for more than one year will not run away.”

Erokoro prayed the court to admit Saraki bail on the ground of self recognition as he will not run away.

Diri, however, stated that the prosecution was not opposing the bail application of Saraki because it may affect his official duties as the Senate President.

He, however, opposed “vehemently” the bail application of the other accused persons because the “charges against them are devious which if they are convicted may attract a prison term of 14 years.”

Diri contended that others, apart from the Senate President if granted bail may evade trial.

On this ground, Diri urged the court to discountenance the bail application of the first, second and fourth defendant.

Justice Halilu in his ruling granted all accused persons bail.

“Considering the submission of the counsels of the accused person, I allow all the accused persons to go home.

“They shall present two reasonable surities who should be Nigerian, owned landed properties in Asokoro, maitama, Wuse 2 and Garki.

“If they fail to meet the bail condition, they shall be remanded in Kuje prison.”

The judge consequently adjourned the matter till July 11 for continuation of tria
Justice Yusuf Halilu of a Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court, Abuja on Monday granted the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, former clerk of the National Assembly, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa bail.
Saraki, Ekweremadu, former clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa and the Deputy Clerk, Benedict Efeturi are facing charges of alleged criminal conspiracy and forgery of the senate standing rule‎s, 2015. The charges were brought against them by the Federal Government.

The prosecutor, Joseph Daodu had filed an application before the Halilu-led court seeking that the accused persons be denied bail because they may tamper with the course of investigation and may likely jump bail.


But counsel to the first accused person, Salisu Maikasuwa, Ikechukwu Ezechukwu argued that there was need to admit his client bail because his client conducted himself properly all through the investigation.

He said, “All through his investigation, he was never detained, and he also made himself available for investigation.”

Ezechukwu urged the court to dismiss the application of the prosecution and grant his client bail on self recognition.

Counsel to the 3rd defendant, the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, Paul Erokoro, SAN, contended that the affidavits filed by the prosecution “never made mention of Saraki and the police in the course of its investigation and the police never invited him for questioning.


“It’s a fact that my client who has being standing trial at the CCT for more than one year will not run away.”

Erokoro prayed the court to admit Saraki bail on the ground of self recognition as he will not run away.

Diri, however, stated that the prosecution was not opposing the bail application of Saraki because it may affect his official duties as the Senate President.

He, however, opposed “vehemently” the bail application of the other accused persons because the “charges against them are devious which if they are convicted may attract a prison term of 14 years.”

Diri contended that others, apart from the Senate President if granted bail may evade trial.

On this ground, Diri urged the court to discountenance the bail application of the first, second and fourth defendant.

Justice Halilu in his ruling granted all accused persons bail.

“Considering the submission of the counsels of the accused person, I allow all the accused persons to go home.

“They shall present two reasonable surities who should be Nigerian, owned landed properties in Asokoro, maitama, Wuse 2 and Garki.

“If they fail to meet the bail condition, they shall be remanded in Kuje prison.”

The judge consequently adjourned the matter till July 11 for continuation of tria

See DOCKED Saraki, Ekweremadu And Co-Accused Criminals In Court

See DOCKED Saraki, Ekweremadu And Co-Accused Criminals In Court

See Docked Saraki, Ekweremadu And Cohorts In Court

See Docked Saraki, Ekweremadu And Cohorts In Court

Photos of Saraki, Ekweremadu Arraigned In Court Today, Plead Not Guilty

Photos of Saraki, Ekweremadu Arraigned In Court Today, Plead Not Guilty

Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Photo Credit: Sahara Reporter
The Senate President, Bukola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and former clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasua have all pleaded not guilty to a two count charge leveled against them.

Saraki alongside his deputy and the former clerk of the National Assembly took their plea at an Abuja FCT High court sitting in Jabi on Monday.

The plea followed an application by the lead prosecution counsel, M.S.Diri who told the Justice Yusuf Halilu-led court that the matter was for arraignment and urged the court to direct that the two count charge be read to the accused persons.

Saraki, Ekweremadu and Maikasua are facing a two count charge bordering on conspiracy and forgery of senate rule in 2015.

Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Photo Credit: Sahara Reporter
Justice Halilu has stood down the matter to allow the prosecution file a counter affidavit against the motion for bail of the accused persons.

Prior to the stand down, Halilu denied asking reporters to vacate the courtroom.

“I will not ask journalists to leave my courtroom, don’t report what is not correct. I represent everybody; my work is to do the best I can,” Halilu said.

Daily Post



Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Photo Credit: Sahara Reporter
The Senate President, Bukola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and former clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasua have all pleaded not guilty to a two count charge leveled against them.

Saraki alongside his deputy and the former clerk of the National Assembly took their plea at an Abuja FCT High court sitting in Jabi on Monday.

The plea followed an application by the lead prosecution counsel, M.S.Diri who told the Justice Yusuf Halilu-led court that the matter was for arraignment and urged the court to direct that the two count charge be read to the accused persons.

Saraki, Ekweremadu and Maikasua are facing a two count charge bordering on conspiracy and forgery of senate rule in 2015.

Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Saraki, Ekweremadu In Court Today
Photo Credit: Sahara Reporter
Justice Halilu has stood down the matter to allow the prosecution file a counter affidavit against the motion for bail of the accused persons.

Prior to the stand down, Halilu denied asking reporters to vacate the courtroom.

“I will not ask journalists to leave my courtroom, don’t report what is not correct. I represent everybody; my work is to do the best I can,” Halilu said.

Daily Post



As The FORGERY Suit Begins Today, Saraki Aborts Hajj Trip, Rushes To Court To Quash Charges

As The FORGERY Suit Begins Today, Saraki Aborts Hajj Trip, Rushes To Court To Quash Charges

saraki on the move
The embattled President of Nigerian Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki has reportedly shelved a planned Saudi trip on Friday, but instead filed an application at an Abuja Federal High Court in a bid to stop today's forgery of the Senate Standing Rule suit slammed against him, his Deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and two senior civil servants working at the National Assembly; the immediate past Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa and the Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly, Benedict Efeture.

The four are billed to face trial at a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Jabi District Abuja, which is a stone’s throw from the Code of Conduct Tribunal where the Senate President is responding to some charges.

It was learnt, according to The Nationa Newspaper that following notice of his arraignment for forgery, Dr. Saraki aborted his trip to Saudi Arabia for lesser Hajj (Umrah).

Saraki through his counsel, says no prima facie case has been established against him.

According to a copy of the charge sheet, all the four defendants will face two-count charge filed by the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mallam Abubakar Malami (SAN) , through Principal State Counsel, D. E. Kaswe, pursuant to Section 104 and 379 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.

While the first charge borders on criminal conspiracy, contrary to Section 97 of the Penal Code, count two is based on alleged forgery contrary to Section 362of the Penal Code Law.

Counsel to the senate president Ahmed Raji (SAN), has urged the court to quash the charges against him and the three others.

He also asked the court to alternatively adjourn the case sine die because the simultaneous  trial at the High Court and the Code of Conduct Tribunal might jeopardize his right to fair hearing.

There were indications that trial judge Justice Yusuf Halilu may entertain Saraki’s preliminary objection after the charges have been read and the plea of the four defendants taken.

“In deference to the rule of law, he chose to stay at home to prove his innocence. Going to Saudi Arabia might attract another meaning.

“You can see that Saraki has nothing to fear at all. He believes he will go through the judicial process as a democrat.

“The outcome of Monday’s (today) session at the court will determine whether or not the Senate President can still perform the lesser Hajj. In the last 10 years, he has not missed this religious obligation.”




saraki on the move
The embattled President of Nigerian Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki has reportedly shelved a planned Saudi trip on Friday, but instead filed an application at an Abuja Federal High Court in a bid to stop today's forgery of the Senate Standing Rule suit slammed against him, his Deputy, Ike Ekweremadu and two senior civil servants working at the National Assembly; the immediate past Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa and the Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly, Benedict Efeture.

The four are billed to face trial at a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Jabi District Abuja, which is a stone’s throw from the Code of Conduct Tribunal where the Senate President is responding to some charges.

It was learnt, according to The Nationa Newspaper that following notice of his arraignment for forgery, Dr. Saraki aborted his trip to Saudi Arabia for lesser Hajj (Umrah).

Saraki through his counsel, says no prima facie case has been established against him.

According to a copy of the charge sheet, all the four defendants will face two-count charge filed by the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mallam Abubakar Malami (SAN) , through Principal State Counsel, D. E. Kaswe, pursuant to Section 104 and 379 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.

While the first charge borders on criminal conspiracy, contrary to Section 97 of the Penal Code, count two is based on alleged forgery contrary to Section 362of the Penal Code Law.

Counsel to the senate president Ahmed Raji (SAN), has urged the court to quash the charges against him and the three others.

He also asked the court to alternatively adjourn the case sine die because the simultaneous  trial at the High Court and the Code of Conduct Tribunal might jeopardize his right to fair hearing.

There were indications that trial judge Justice Yusuf Halilu may entertain Saraki’s preliminary objection after the charges have been read and the plea of the four defendants taken.

“In deference to the rule of law, he chose to stay at home to prove his innocence. Going to Saudi Arabia might attract another meaning.

“You can see that Saraki has nothing to fear at all. He believes he will go through the judicial process as a democrat.

“The outcome of Monday’s (today) session at the court will determine whether or not the Senate President can still perform the lesser Hajj. In the last 10 years, he has not missed this religious obligation.”




FG Lines Up 15 Witnesses To Sink Saraki, Ekweremadu Over Forgery Crime

FG Lines Up 15 Witnesses To Sink Saraki, Ekweremadu Over Forgery Crime

FG Lines Up 15 Witnesses To Sink Saraki, Ekweremadu Over Forgery Crime
The chances of Senate President, Dr Bukola Saraki and his deputy Mr Ike Ekweremadu hanging on to their positions seems slimmer by the day as the federal government moves takes another step in removing them from their respective offices

No fewer than 15 witnesses have been lined up by the Federal Government in the forgery case brought against them

Others due to appear before the court on Monday for allegedly forging the Senate Standing Rules 2015 are a former Clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa, and the Acting Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly‎, Benedict Efeturi.

In the court summons pasted on the Notice Board of the National Assembly on Tuesday, about 15 witnesses were listed by the Federal Government to testify against the defendants.

Among the witnesses are Senator Solomon Ewuga, Senator Ita Enang, Senator Ajayi Borrofice, Senator Kabiru Marafa, Senator Babafemi Ojudu, Senator Abu Ibrahim, Senator Ahmad Lawan and David Igbodo, an Assistant Superintendent of Police.

FG Lines Up 15 Witnesses To Sink Saraki, Ekweremadu Over Forgery Crime
The chances of Senate President, Dr Bukola Saraki and his deputy Mr Ike Ekweremadu hanging on to their positions seems slimmer by the day as the federal government moves takes another step in removing them from their respective offices

No fewer than 15 witnesses have been lined up by the Federal Government in the forgery case brought against them

Others due to appear before the court on Monday for allegedly forging the Senate Standing Rules 2015 are a former Clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa, and the Acting Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly‎, Benedict Efeturi.

In the court summons pasted on the Notice Board of the National Assembly on Tuesday, about 15 witnesses were listed by the Federal Government to testify against the defendants.

Among the witnesses are Senator Solomon Ewuga, Senator Ita Enang, Senator Ajayi Borrofice, Senator Kabiru Marafa, Senator Babafemi Ojudu, Senator Abu Ibrahim, Senator Ahmad Lawan and David Igbodo, an Assistant Superintendent of Police.

Court Officials Paste Saraki, Ekweremadu's CRIMINAL Summons On NASS Board, See Photo

Court Officials Paste Saraki, Ekweremadu's CRIMINAL Summons On NASS Board, See Photo

Court Officials Paste Saraki, Ekweremadu's Summon On NASS Board, See Photo
The official court summons inviting the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, his Deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, the outgoing Clerk to the National Assembly, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa; and  the Deputy Clerk, Benedict Efeturi, to appear before the court for the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Order 2015. was yesterday pasted on the Senate board by some people, suspected to be bailiffs from the FCT High Court, Abuja.

The Summon read;

“By oral application, dated June 21, 2016, moved by D. E. Kaswe, Principal State Counsel, Federal Ministry of Justice, in this case praying the court for:

“An order of this Honourable Court granting leave to the complainant/applicant to serve the criminal summons on the defendants by substituted means to wit by pasting it at the Notice Board of the National Assembly, Three Arms Zone, Abuja.

“And after hearing D. E. Kaswe with A. A. Kaltingo Esq, counsel for the complainant/applicant moved the court orally for the above relief.”

It was also observed that the handwritten statements of Maikasuwa and Efeturi as well as that of 13 other former senators, interrogated by the police, were also pasted along with the court summons, Punch Newspaper reports

In their own submissions to the police as contained in the document pasted to the board at the National Assembly, Maikasuwa and Efeturi denied being part of the alleged forgery of the document.

Maikashuwa said, “The Senate Standing Order used in Seventh Senate was not known to me. The Clerk of the Senate (Efeturi) is in position to know. I was not aware of the amendment that was made to the Standing rules.”

Efeturi said, “The Senate Leadership handled the 2015 Standing Rules as amended by their convention and practice. Standing Orders 2003, 2007 and 2011 followed similar practice.”

Our correspondent further noted that a Deputy Inspector-General of Police interrogated and obtained statements from 15 witnesses, including Senators Suleiman Hunkunyi, Solomon Enang, Solomon Ewuga, Ahmad Lawan, Abu Ibrahim and Babafemi Ojudu, on the issue.

Some Sergeant-at-Arms, however, besieged the notice board and removed all the court summons even when many people were still reading the documents.

Court Officials Paste Saraki, Ekweremadu's Summon On NASS Board, See Photo

Court Officials Paste Saraki, Ekweremadu's Summon On NASS Board, See Photo
The official court summons inviting the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, his Deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, the outgoing Clerk to the National Assembly, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa; and  the Deputy Clerk, Benedict Efeturi, to appear before the court for the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Order 2015. was yesterday pasted on the Senate board by some people, suspected to be bailiffs from the FCT High Court, Abuja.

The Summon read;

“By oral application, dated June 21, 2016, moved by D. E. Kaswe, Principal State Counsel, Federal Ministry of Justice, in this case praying the court for:

“An order of this Honourable Court granting leave to the complainant/applicant to serve the criminal summons on the defendants by substituted means to wit by pasting it at the Notice Board of the National Assembly, Three Arms Zone, Abuja.

“And after hearing D. E. Kaswe with A. A. Kaltingo Esq, counsel for the complainant/applicant moved the court orally for the above relief.”

It was also observed that the handwritten statements of Maikasuwa and Efeturi as well as that of 13 other former senators, interrogated by the police, were also pasted along with the court summons, Punch Newspaper reports

In their own submissions to the police as contained in the document pasted to the board at the National Assembly, Maikasuwa and Efeturi denied being part of the alleged forgery of the document.

Maikashuwa said, “The Senate Standing Order used in Seventh Senate was not known to me. The Clerk of the Senate (Efeturi) is in position to know. I was not aware of the amendment that was made to the Standing rules.”

Efeturi said, “The Senate Leadership handled the 2015 Standing Rules as amended by their convention and practice. Standing Orders 2003, 2007 and 2011 followed similar practice.”

Our correspondent further noted that a Deputy Inspector-General of Police interrogated and obtained statements from 15 witnesses, including Senators Suleiman Hunkunyi, Solomon Enang, Solomon Ewuga, Ahmad Lawan, Abu Ibrahim and Babafemi Ojudu, on the issue.

Some Sergeant-at-Arms, however, besieged the notice board and removed all the court summons even when many people were still reading the documents.

Court Officials Paste Saraki, Ekweremadu's Summon On NASS Board, See Photo

Saraki, Ekweremadu's Forgery Case POSTPONED, Summons Notice Pasted On N'Assembly Notice Board

Saraki, Ekweremadu's Forgery Case POSTPONED, Summons Notice Pasted On N'Assembly Notice Board

The supposed trial of the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, and the Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu, on alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rules has been postponed till next week Monday by the Federal Hight Court, Abuja., TheEagle Online says

This is just as the Court granted orders to paste the charges against Saraki and Ekweremadu on the National Assembly notice board.

Justice Yusuf Halilu fixed the date after ordering substituted service of the charges on the defendants.‎

Apart from Saraki and Ekweremadu, the outgoing clerk of the National Assembly, Salishu Maikasuwa, and the Deputy Acting Clerk of the National Assembly, Ben Efeturi, are also charged to court on the same forgery allegation.

The accused persons were initially to be arraigned in court on Tuesday (today).

However, due to the inability of to serve them the court summons properly, it was postponed till next week.

Also accused along Saraki and Ekweremadu forging the senate standing rule that helped Saraki and Ekweremadu emerge leaders of the senate last year. are former Clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa and his deputy, Benedict Efeturi.
The supposed trial of the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, and the Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu, on alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rules has been postponed till next week Monday by the Federal Hight Court, Abuja., TheEagle Online says

This is just as the Court granted orders to paste the charges against Saraki and Ekweremadu on the National Assembly notice board.

Justice Yusuf Halilu fixed the date after ordering substituted service of the charges on the defendants.‎

Apart from Saraki and Ekweremadu, the outgoing clerk of the National Assembly, Salishu Maikasuwa, and the Deputy Acting Clerk of the National Assembly, Ben Efeturi, are also charged to court on the same forgery allegation.

The accused persons were initially to be arraigned in court on Tuesday (today).

However, due to the inability of to serve them the court summons properly, it was postponed till next week.

Also accused along Saraki and Ekweremadu forging the senate standing rule that helped Saraki and Ekweremadu emerge leaders of the senate last year. are former Clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa and his deputy, Benedict Efeturi.

Double 'Wahala' For Saraki As Forgery Suit, CCT Trial All Slated For Tomorow

Double 'Wahala' For Saraki As Forgery Suit, CCT Trial All Slated For Tomorow

Double 'Wahala' For Saraki As Forgery Suit, CCT Trial All Slated For Tomorow
The trouble that has befallen the President of the Senate, Bukola Saraki since hs emergence over a year ago took a new dimension as he will face different criminal charges tomorrow.

As Saraki is scheduled to appear on Tuesday before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Jabi, Abuja for arraignment on charges of forgery, he will also appear before the Code of Conduct Tribunal for his ongoing trial for alleged false and anticipatory asset declaration.

Both the FCT High Court and the CCT share a boundary in Jabi area of Abuja, Punch Newspaper reports.

According to Punch Newspaper, Sources from the Federal Ministry of Justice confirmed to our correspondent on the telephone on Monday that Saraki alongside the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu and their co-accused will appear before Justice Yusuf Halilu, for arraignment on two counts of forgery and criminal conspiracy tomorrow.

Saraki, Ekweremadu, a former Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasu, and his deputy, Benedict Efeturi, were on June 10, charged with criminal conspiracy and forgery of the Standing Rules used for the leadership election of the presiding officers of the Senate in J‎une last year.

The Federal Government  stated that the offence of conspiracy is punishable under Section 97 (1) of the Penal Code Act; and offence of forgery with “fraudulent intent” punishable under Section 364 of the same law.

Meanwhile, the  Code of Conduct Tribunal had on June 15 adjourned the trial of the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, till June 21.

The tribunal adjourned for the hearing of a fresh motion filed by Saraki seeking an order of the CCT disqualifying its Chairman, Danladi Umar, from further presiding over the case.

Saraki filed his fresh application accusing Umar of bias based on the remark made by the tribunal chairman at the last proceedings on June 7, 2016, while warning the defence against delay tactics.

Umar made the statement that was picked up while warning the defence that their delay tactics would not “reduce the consequences the defendant will meet in this tribunal at the end of the trial”.

Saraki, in his fresh application filed by his lawyer, Kanu Agabi (SAN), alleged that Umar’s statement would prejudice the outcome of the trial.

Saraki is being prosecuted by the Federal Government before the CCT on 16 counts, including false and anticipatory asset declaration, which he allegedly made between 2003 and 2011 when he served as the Governor of Kwara State.

He is ‎also accused  of operating foreign accounts as a public officer and of receiving governor’s salary or emoluments  in addition to his salary as a senator for some periods after completing his two terms as governor and got elected as a senator.


Double 'Wahala' For Saraki As Forgery Suit, CCT Trial All Slated For Tomorow
The trouble that has befallen the President of the Senate, Bukola Saraki since hs emergence over a year ago took a new dimension as he will face different criminal charges tomorrow.

As Saraki is scheduled to appear on Tuesday before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Jabi, Abuja for arraignment on charges of forgery, he will also appear before the Code of Conduct Tribunal for his ongoing trial for alleged false and anticipatory asset declaration.

Both the FCT High Court and the CCT share a boundary in Jabi area of Abuja, Punch Newspaper reports.

According to Punch Newspaper, Sources from the Federal Ministry of Justice confirmed to our correspondent on the telephone on Monday that Saraki alongside the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu and their co-accused will appear before Justice Yusuf Halilu, for arraignment on two counts of forgery and criminal conspiracy tomorrow.

Saraki, Ekweremadu, a former Clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasu, and his deputy, Benedict Efeturi, were on June 10, charged with criminal conspiracy and forgery of the Standing Rules used for the leadership election of the presiding officers of the Senate in J‎une last year.

The Federal Government  stated that the offence of conspiracy is punishable under Section 97 (1) of the Penal Code Act; and offence of forgery with “fraudulent intent” punishable under Section 364 of the same law.

Meanwhile, the  Code of Conduct Tribunal had on June 15 adjourned the trial of the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, till June 21.

The tribunal adjourned for the hearing of a fresh motion filed by Saraki seeking an order of the CCT disqualifying its Chairman, Danladi Umar, from further presiding over the case.

Saraki filed his fresh application accusing Umar of bias based on the remark made by the tribunal chairman at the last proceedings on June 7, 2016, while warning the defence against delay tactics.

Umar made the statement that was picked up while warning the defence that their delay tactics would not “reduce the consequences the defendant will meet in this tribunal at the end of the trial”.

Saraki, in his fresh application filed by his lawyer, Kanu Agabi (SAN), alleged that Umar’s statement would prejudice the outcome of the trial.

Saraki is being prosecuted by the Federal Government before the CCT on 16 counts, including false and anticipatory asset declaration, which he allegedly made between 2003 and 2011 when he served as the Governor of Kwara State.

He is ‎also accused  of operating foreign accounts as a public officer and of receiving governor’s salary or emoluments  in addition to his salary as a senator for some periods after completing his two terms as governor and got elected as a senator.


Saraki And Ekweremadu Evade Court Summons Over Forgery Of Senate Standing Order

Saraki And Ekweremadu Evade Court Summons Over Forgery Of Senate Standing Order

Saraki And Ekweremadu Evade Court Summons Over Forgery Of Senate Standing Order
Sahara Reporters - Indications emerged last night that the Federal Government may serve court summons on  President Bukola Saraki and Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu respectively, through the Acting Clerk of the National Assembly,  Mohammed Sani-Omolori, following alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rules of 2015. The duo has evaded service of court summons since they were informed about their pending forgery trial late last week.

Last week, the Federal Government filed charges against Saraki and Ekweremadu in the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja.
Others joined in the suit are former Clerk of the National Assembly, Abubakar Maikasuwa and Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly, Benedict Efeturi, who has just few months left to retire from the civil service.

The charges are allegedly based on the outcome of police investigation into the forgery, but Saraki and Ekweremadu claimed yesterday that they were never invited for questioning by the Nigeria Police before preferring charges against them.

They lamented that they were only invited for questioning on June 7, 2016, which was barely three days to the filing of the two charges against them on June 10. 

Sources at the office of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice told SaharaReporters that it has been difficult for the court summons- charge sheet and hearing notices- to be served on Saraki and Ekweremadu.

"We have not been able to access Saraki and Ekweremadu to serve them both the summons and charge sheets but from the look of things, we may invoke relevant sections of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act ( 2015), which empowers us to notify them through the Clerk of the National Assembly or by pasting the summons on the conspicuous part of their premises or offices.

"We will invoke sections 124 and 125(1) (2)  of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act hopefully by today (Monday). By then, we should have completed the process of serving the summons on them."

There was anxiety in Saraki and Ekweremadu's camps last night in the latest court action against them as they alleged that there are plans to arrest and lock them in Kuje prison.

"We learnt of a plot to arrest and detain Saraki and Ekweremadu. We are watching the development and we would respond accordingly within the ambit of the rule of law.

"I think they want to trick them into police custody and detain them before arraigning them in court," said another source.
Saraki And Ekweremadu Evade Court Summons Over Forgery Of Senate Standing Order
Sahara Reporters - Indications emerged last night that the Federal Government may serve court summons on  President Bukola Saraki and Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu respectively, through the Acting Clerk of the National Assembly,  Mohammed Sani-Omolori, following alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rules of 2015. The duo has evaded service of court summons since they were informed about their pending forgery trial late last week.

Last week, the Federal Government filed charges against Saraki and Ekweremadu in the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja.
Others joined in the suit are former Clerk of the National Assembly, Abubakar Maikasuwa and Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly, Benedict Efeturi, who has just few months left to retire from the civil service.

The charges are allegedly based on the outcome of police investigation into the forgery, but Saraki and Ekweremadu claimed yesterday that they were never invited for questioning by the Nigeria Police before preferring charges against them.

They lamented that they were only invited for questioning on June 7, 2016, which was barely three days to the filing of the two charges against them on June 10. 

Sources at the office of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice told SaharaReporters that it has been difficult for the court summons- charge sheet and hearing notices- to be served on Saraki and Ekweremadu.

"We have not been able to access Saraki and Ekweremadu to serve them both the summons and charge sheets but from the look of things, we may invoke relevant sections of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act ( 2015), which empowers us to notify them through the Clerk of the National Assembly or by pasting the summons on the conspicuous part of their premises or offices.

"We will invoke sections 124 and 125(1) (2)  of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act hopefully by today (Monday). By then, we should have completed the process of serving the summons on them."

There was anxiety in Saraki and Ekweremadu's camps last night in the latest court action against them as they alleged that there are plans to arrest and lock them in Kuje prison.

"We learnt of a plot to arrest and detain Saraki and Ekweremadu. We are watching the development and we would respond accordingly within the ambit of the rule of law.

"I think they want to trick them into police custody and detain them before arraigning them in court," said another source.

Saraki, Ekweremadu Forgery Case: "Don't Dare Us", Senate Spits Fire At FG

Saraki, Ekweremadu Forgery Case: "Don't Dare Us", Senate Spits Fire At FG

Saraki, Ekweremadu Forgery Case: "Don't Dare Us", Senate Spits Fire At FG
Following a forgery suit filed by the Federal Government against the Senate President, Bu­kola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekwerenmadu and other clerical staff of the National Assembly, at the Federal High Court, Abuja, the Senate yesterday spat fire, warning that the FG should  not dare the senior legislative arm

The Senate warned against mistaking its maturity and hand of co-operation being extended to the Presidency as a sign of weakness.

The FG, through the of­fice of the Attorney-Gener­al of the Federation (AGF), on June 10, 2016, slammed a two-count charge border­ing on criminal conspiracy and forgery against Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa, Benedict Efeturi, Saraki and Ekweremadu.

In the suit, Saraki, Ekweremadu and oth­ers allegedly “caused the Standing Order to be believed as the genuine Standing Orders, 2015 and circulated same for use during the inauguration of the 8th Senate of the Na­tional Assembly of the Fed­eral Republic of Nigeria, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code Law.”

But the Senate, through its spokesman, Abdullahi Sabi described the suit as unconstitutional, viola­tion of the principles of separation of powers as enshrined in the constitu­tion and danger to Nige­ria’s democracy.

Senate accused the executive of plotting to muzzle the legislature and criminalise legislative process in order to force a leadership change, “or, in the extreme case, ground the Red Chamber of the National Assembly. Or how does one interpret a move in which the two presiding officers are be­ing set up to be remanded in Kuje Prison or inca­pacitated from sitting at plenary through a day-to-day trial on a matter that is purely an internal affair of the Senate.”

The senate spokes­man also alleged that the presidency was desperate to return to the era of im­punity and lack of respect for due process.

“We urge President Muhammadu Buhari to call his Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, to order. The Senate of the Federal Republic voted freely to elect its leader­ship into office and con­tinuing attempts to change that leadership through the wanton abuse of judi­cial processes cannot stand in the eyes of the world.”

This is even as Ekwer­emadu said he was not scared of the fresh suit filed against him.

Speaking through his media aide, Mr. Uche Ani­chukwu, Ekweremadu not­ed that the media reports on his purported invitation by the Nigeria Police and the charges reportedly preferred against him be­fore the FCT High Court, Abuja, in connection with the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Orders 2011 was a fresh attempt to witchhunt him.

“The hands of Senator Ike Ekweremadu are clean because he has no business whatsoever with the pro­duction of Senate Standing Orders. This latest attempt to try and convict him in the court of public opinion notwithstanding, we do not want to mount a public defence. We would rather meet them in court if they so wish,” the aide said.

The crisis rocking the Red Chamber started last year following the emer­gence of Saraki as Sen­ate President against the wishes of some powerful interests in the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Dissatisfied with the Saraki’s “coup”, some sena­tors under the aegis of the Unity Forum approached an Abuja Federal High Court, seeking the nul­lification of the election based on claims that the Senate Standing Rules were forged.

But the Senate spokes­man said the Attorney General and party leaders behind the latest court action either lacked the understanding of the underlining principles of constitutional democracy, the concept of separation of powers, checks and bal­ances and parliamentary convention or they do not care if the present democ­racy survived or collapsed “in their blinded determi­nation to get Saraki and Ekweremadu by all means necessary, including abuse of office and sacking the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“The Nigerian people have enough economic hardship at this time requiring the full attention and cooperation of the three arms of government, instead of these attempts to distract and politicise governance. We are in a state of economic emer­gency such that what the National Assembly needs at this time are executive bills and proposals aimed at resolving the crises of unemployment, currency depreciation, inflation, crime and insecurity.

“What the National Assembly needs now are executive bills to build and strengthen institutions to earn revenues, fight corruption and eliminate waste. Instead, we are getting hostile actions aimed at destabilising the National Assembly, distracting Senators from their oversight functions and ensuring good and ac­countable governance.”

The Senate further maintained: “We must make it clear here to the individuals in the Execu­tive arm and party leader­ship behind these plots not to mistake the maturity and hand of co-operation being extended to the Presidency by the legisla­ture as a sign of weakness.

“The National Assembly bent backwards to accom­modate various infrac­tions and inefficiencies in pursuit of inter-arms co-operation and national interest. We did not follow up the various infractions because we believe there are bigger issues which the government has to at­tend to in order to ensure that every Nigerian have food on his table and live comfortably in a secure environment. We know that the country is actu­ally in a state of economic emergency and all hands must be on deck.”

Daily Sun
Saraki, Ekweremadu Forgery Case: "Don't Dare Us", Senate Spits Fire At FG
Following a forgery suit filed by the Federal Government against the Senate President, Bu­kola Saraki, his deputy, Ike Ekwerenmadu and other clerical staff of the National Assembly, at the Federal High Court, Abuja, the Senate yesterday spat fire, warning that the FG should  not dare the senior legislative arm

The Senate warned against mistaking its maturity and hand of co-operation being extended to the Presidency as a sign of weakness.

The FG, through the of­fice of the Attorney-Gener­al of the Federation (AGF), on June 10, 2016, slammed a two-count charge border­ing on criminal conspiracy and forgery against Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa, Benedict Efeturi, Saraki and Ekweremadu.

In the suit, Saraki, Ekweremadu and oth­ers allegedly “caused the Standing Order to be believed as the genuine Standing Orders, 2015 and circulated same for use during the inauguration of the 8th Senate of the Na­tional Assembly of the Fed­eral Republic of Nigeria, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code Law.”

But the Senate, through its spokesman, Abdullahi Sabi described the suit as unconstitutional, viola­tion of the principles of separation of powers as enshrined in the constitu­tion and danger to Nige­ria’s democracy.

Senate accused the executive of plotting to muzzle the legislature and criminalise legislative process in order to force a leadership change, “or, in the extreme case, ground the Red Chamber of the National Assembly. Or how does one interpret a move in which the two presiding officers are be­ing set up to be remanded in Kuje Prison or inca­pacitated from sitting at plenary through a day-to-day trial on a matter that is purely an internal affair of the Senate.”

The senate spokes­man also alleged that the presidency was desperate to return to the era of im­punity and lack of respect for due process.

“We urge President Muhammadu Buhari to call his Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, to order. The Senate of the Federal Republic voted freely to elect its leader­ship into office and con­tinuing attempts to change that leadership through the wanton abuse of judi­cial processes cannot stand in the eyes of the world.”

This is even as Ekwer­emadu said he was not scared of the fresh suit filed against him.

Speaking through his media aide, Mr. Uche Ani­chukwu, Ekweremadu not­ed that the media reports on his purported invitation by the Nigeria Police and the charges reportedly preferred against him be­fore the FCT High Court, Abuja, in connection with the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Orders 2011 was a fresh attempt to witchhunt him.

“The hands of Senator Ike Ekweremadu are clean because he has no business whatsoever with the pro­duction of Senate Standing Orders. This latest attempt to try and convict him in the court of public opinion notwithstanding, we do not want to mount a public defence. We would rather meet them in court if they so wish,” the aide said.

The crisis rocking the Red Chamber started last year following the emer­gence of Saraki as Sen­ate President against the wishes of some powerful interests in the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Dissatisfied with the Saraki’s “coup”, some sena­tors under the aegis of the Unity Forum approached an Abuja Federal High Court, seeking the nul­lification of the election based on claims that the Senate Standing Rules were forged.

But the Senate spokes­man said the Attorney General and party leaders behind the latest court action either lacked the understanding of the underlining principles of constitutional democracy, the concept of separation of powers, checks and bal­ances and parliamentary convention or they do not care if the present democ­racy survived or collapsed “in their blinded determi­nation to get Saraki and Ekweremadu by all means necessary, including abuse of office and sacking the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“The Nigerian people have enough economic hardship at this time requiring the full attention and cooperation of the three arms of government, instead of these attempts to distract and politicise governance. We are in a state of economic emer­gency such that what the National Assembly needs at this time are executive bills and proposals aimed at resolving the crises of unemployment, currency depreciation, inflation, crime and insecurity.

“What the National Assembly needs now are executive bills to build and strengthen institutions to earn revenues, fight corruption and eliminate waste. Instead, we are getting hostile actions aimed at destabilising the National Assembly, distracting Senators from their oversight functions and ensuring good and ac­countable governance.”

The Senate further maintained: “We must make it clear here to the individuals in the Execu­tive arm and party leader­ship behind these plots not to mistake the maturity and hand of co-operation being extended to the Presidency by the legisla­ture as a sign of weakness.

“The National Assembly bent backwards to accom­modate various infrac­tions and inefficiencies in pursuit of inter-arms co-operation and national interest. We did not follow up the various infractions because we believe there are bigger issues which the government has to at­tend to in order to ensure that every Nigerian have food on his table and live comfortably in a secure environment. We know that the country is actu­ally in a state of economic emergency and all hands must be on deck.”

Daily Sun

Senate FORGERY Scandal: Saraki In FRESH Trouble As FG Files New Suit Against Him, Ekweremadu

Senate FORGERY Scandal: Saraki In FRESH Trouble As FG Files New Suit Against Him, Ekweremadu

The Federal Government has filed charges at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Abuja, against the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, over the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rules.

Others are the immediate past Clerk to the National Assembly,  Abubakar Maikasuwa and the Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly, Benedict Efeturi.

Federal Government of Nigeria (Complainant) slammed a two-count charge of “criminal conspiracy, contrary to Section 97 of the Penal Code Law” and “Forgery contrary to 362 of the Penal Code Law” against Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa, Benedict Efeturi, Dr. Olubukola Saraki, and Ike Ekweremadu.

In its Particulars of Offence to count one, the Federal Government alleged that the accused persons committed the offence of Conspiracy, punishable under Section 97 (1) of the Penal Code Law.

The Federal Government further alleged that Saraki, Ekweremadu and others caused the Standing Order to be believed as the genuine Standing Orders, 2015 and circulated same for use during the inauguration of the 8th Senate of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code Law.

The charge sheet dated 10th June 2016 was signed by D.E Kaswe Esq., Principal State Counsel on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Federation and backed by an Affidavit of Completion of Investigation deposed to at the Federal High Court Registry, Abuja on the same date by Okara Neji Jonah, a Litigation Officer at the Federal Ministry of Justice, Abuja.

Listed as witnesses in the suit, which has been assigned to Hon. Justice Yusuf Haliru for hearing are, 
Senator Othman Hunkuyi, Senator Ahmed Lawan, Senator Abdullahi Gumel, Senator Kabiru Marafa, Senator Robert Boroffice, Senator Gbenga Ashafa, and Senator Abu Ibrahim, all members of the Senate Unity Forum (SUF), the group of Senators that pushed unsuccessfully for the election of Senator Lawan as the Senate President.

Other witnesses include former Chairman, Senate Committee on Rules and Business, currently Senior Special Assistant (SSA) to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Senator Ita Enang; 

Deputy Inspector-General of Police (DIG) in charge of FCIID and one of the contenders for the Office of the IGP, Dan’Azumi Doma, and Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters, Senator Ojudu Babafemi. Isyaka Laminu Badamasi, Nuru Shehu Toro, Bulus Atsen, Ali Wakili, Shehu Sani
The Federal Government has filed charges at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Abuja, against the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, over the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rules.

Others are the immediate past Clerk to the National Assembly,  Abubakar Maikasuwa and the Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly, Benedict Efeturi.

Federal Government of Nigeria (Complainant) slammed a two-count charge of “criminal conspiracy, contrary to Section 97 of the Penal Code Law” and “Forgery contrary to 362 of the Penal Code Law” against Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa, Benedict Efeturi, Dr. Olubukola Saraki, and Ike Ekweremadu.

In its Particulars of Offence to count one, the Federal Government alleged that the accused persons committed the offence of Conspiracy, punishable under Section 97 (1) of the Penal Code Law.

The Federal Government further alleged that Saraki, Ekweremadu and others caused the Standing Order to be believed as the genuine Standing Orders, 2015 and circulated same for use during the inauguration of the 8th Senate of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code Law.

The charge sheet dated 10th June 2016 was signed by D.E Kaswe Esq., Principal State Counsel on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Federation and backed by an Affidavit of Completion of Investigation deposed to at the Federal High Court Registry, Abuja on the same date by Okara Neji Jonah, a Litigation Officer at the Federal Ministry of Justice, Abuja.

Listed as witnesses in the suit, which has been assigned to Hon. Justice Yusuf Haliru for hearing are, 
Senator Othman Hunkuyi, Senator Ahmed Lawan, Senator Abdullahi Gumel, Senator Kabiru Marafa, Senator Robert Boroffice, Senator Gbenga Ashafa, and Senator Abu Ibrahim, all members of the Senate Unity Forum (SUF), the group of Senators that pushed unsuccessfully for the election of Senator Lawan as the Senate President.

Other witnesses include former Chairman, Senate Committee on Rules and Business, currently Senior Special Assistant (SSA) to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Senator Ita Enang; 

Deputy Inspector-General of Police (DIG) in charge of FCIID and one of the contenders for the Office of the IGP, Dan’Azumi Doma, and Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters, Senator Ojudu Babafemi. Isyaka Laminu Badamasi, Nuru Shehu Toro, Bulus Atsen, Ali Wakili, Shehu Sani

Desperate Saraki In Fresh Fight-To-Finish With Presidency Over New NASS Clerk; You'll Be Shocked At The Secret Behind

Desperate Saraki In Fresh Fight-To-Finish With Presidency Over New NASS Clerk; You'll Be Shocked At The Secret Behind

In a bid to cover-up for the perjury case that heralded his emergence as the Senate President of the 8th National Assembly, Bukola Saraki is in fresh desperate move to ensure his stooge emerged as the next clerk of the national assembly, Ripples Nigeria reports this morning.

As reported by our source, News punch understands that forces in the presidency are engaged in a battle of wits with Senate President, Bukola Saraki over the appointment of an Acting Clerk to the National Assembly (CNA).

The current CNA Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa is expected to proceed on terminal leave from May 14.

The CNA is statutorily appointed by the National Assembly Service Commission (NASC), a parastatal responsible for recruiting and managing the workforce of the National Assembly.

The 12 Commissioners of the body are however appointed by the President from across the six geo-political zones of the nation.

The replacement of Maikasuwa has been enmeshed in intrigues and controversies with the NASC appointing Clerk of the House of Representatives, Mohammed Sani-Omolori, as Acting Clerk.

His appointment was however challenged by Saraki in a letter on April 22 to Chairman of the Commission, Dr Adamu Fika.

The Senate President called for withdrawal of Sani-Omolori’s appointment because he was not consulted and the exercise was carried out without consideration for the principle of seniority in the Civil Service.

Saraki called for the appointment of the Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly (DCNA), Benedict Efeturi, instead of Sani-Omolori.

But Fika countered that Efeturi was not qualified for the post because it is against Civil Service rule to appoint someone who is six months away from terminal leave.

Investigations revealed that Saraki and forces in the presidency are desperate to have their stooges in the office because of the Senate perjury, which has been reopened by the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami.

Malami has given the Director of Public Prosecution and the Police two weeks to prefer charges against suspects, who allegedly forged the Senate Standing Orders used for the proclamation of the current 8th Senate.

It is believed that the Senate Standing Orders were forged to facilitate the election of Saraki and Senator Ike Ekeremadu on June 9, 2015.

The former CNA, it was alleged, connived with former Senate President David Mark to alter the Standing Orders few days before the election.

Forces in the presidency believe that by determining the new CNA, it will be easy to prove the complicity of Mark, Ekeremadu and others in the case.

A source told Ripples Nigeria: “You know the CNA is the live wire of the National Assembly. They could get away with the alteration because the man there cooperated.

“If someone else gets there, he will help to facilitate quick trial and even reveal more facts that will nail the culprits.

“But if they have their way again, we should expect the case to die a natural death. This is why it is essential to stop them from having their man in the office again.”

The Saraki’s camp is also desperate to get Efeturi into office to get favourable directions during the case.

Should the case of criminal conspiracy, forgery, breach of official trust and unlawful assembly said to have contravened various provisions of the Penal Code be proven, it will consume the leadership of the Senate.

This is considered another potential banana peel for the embattled Saraki to tackle aside from his ongoing trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) over alleged false declaration of assets.

It was learnt that both camps are prepared to go for broke over the appointment, fuelling fears that the vacancy might not be filled after May 14.

While Fika is believed to be dancing to the tune of presidential forces, Saraki is said to be leaving nothing to chances in the battle to install the next CNA.
In a bid to cover-up for the perjury case that heralded his emergence as the Senate President of the 8th National Assembly, Bukola Saraki is in fresh desperate move to ensure his stooge emerged as the next clerk of the national assembly, Ripples Nigeria reports this morning.

As reported by our source, News punch understands that forces in the presidency are engaged in a battle of wits with Senate President, Bukola Saraki over the appointment of an Acting Clerk to the National Assembly (CNA).

The current CNA Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa is expected to proceed on terminal leave from May 14.

The CNA is statutorily appointed by the National Assembly Service Commission (NASC), a parastatal responsible for recruiting and managing the workforce of the National Assembly.

The 12 Commissioners of the body are however appointed by the President from across the six geo-political zones of the nation.

The replacement of Maikasuwa has been enmeshed in intrigues and controversies with the NASC appointing Clerk of the House of Representatives, Mohammed Sani-Omolori, as Acting Clerk.

His appointment was however challenged by Saraki in a letter on April 22 to Chairman of the Commission, Dr Adamu Fika.

The Senate President called for withdrawal of Sani-Omolori’s appointment because he was not consulted and the exercise was carried out without consideration for the principle of seniority in the Civil Service.

Saraki called for the appointment of the Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly (DCNA), Benedict Efeturi, instead of Sani-Omolori.

But Fika countered that Efeturi was not qualified for the post because it is against Civil Service rule to appoint someone who is six months away from terminal leave.

Investigations revealed that Saraki and forces in the presidency are desperate to have their stooges in the office because of the Senate perjury, which has been reopened by the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami.

Malami has given the Director of Public Prosecution and the Police two weeks to prefer charges against suspects, who allegedly forged the Senate Standing Orders used for the proclamation of the current 8th Senate.

It is believed that the Senate Standing Orders were forged to facilitate the election of Saraki and Senator Ike Ekeremadu on June 9, 2015.

The former CNA, it was alleged, connived with former Senate President David Mark to alter the Standing Orders few days before the election.

Forces in the presidency believe that by determining the new CNA, it will be easy to prove the complicity of Mark, Ekeremadu and others in the case.

A source told Ripples Nigeria: “You know the CNA is the live wire of the National Assembly. They could get away with the alteration because the man there cooperated.

“If someone else gets there, he will help to facilitate quick trial and even reveal more facts that will nail the culprits.

“But if they have their way again, we should expect the case to die a natural death. This is why it is essential to stop them from having their man in the office again.”

The Saraki’s camp is also desperate to get Efeturi into office to get favourable directions during the case.

Should the case of criminal conspiracy, forgery, breach of official trust and unlawful assembly said to have contravened various provisions of the Penal Code be proven, it will consume the leadership of the Senate.

This is considered another potential banana peel for the embattled Saraki to tackle aside from his ongoing trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) over alleged false declaration of assets.

It was learnt that both camps are prepared to go for broke over the appointment, fuelling fears that the vacancy might not be filled after May 14.

While Fika is believed to be dancing to the tune of presidential forces, Saraki is said to be leaving nothing to chances in the battle to install the next CNA.

Fika Dares Saraki Over NASS New Clerk Appointment

Fika Dares Saraki Over NASS New Clerk Appointment

Nigerian Pilot - Battle over who takes over from the incumbent clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa, appears to be getting out of hand as the Chairman of National Assembly Service Commission, Adamu Fika, has confronted the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, on why the appointment of Mohammed Sani-Omolori cannot be reversed.

Saraki had, in a letter last week, asked the Chairman of National Assembly Service Commission to reverse the appointment of Sani-Omolori as the acting clerk of National Assembly.

He rather asked the Commission to consider, Benedict Efeturi, the deputy acting clerk of National Assembly, for the position.

However, in response to Saraki’s letter, Fika said reversing the decision of the Commission appointing Sani-omolori as the acting Clerk to the National Assembly cannot be tenable because it is against the Nigerian Public Service rule.

In a memorandum he submitted to the 440th meeting of the Commission held on April 20, Fika explained that Efeturi was not appointed to the position because he would proceed on retirement leave on August 2.

He said in conformity with the convention and practices of the service, no officer who has less than six months to retire would act in higher office.

“Mr. Benedict Efeturi, who presently acts as Deputy Clerk to National Assembly, will also proceed on his three months terminal leave on 2nd August, 2016, days before the end of the current Clerk’s terminal leave,” he said, adding: “It is neither expedient nor in conformity with convention and practices of the Service for an officer who has less than six months left to retire from service to act in a higher office.

“Mr. Mohammed Sani-Omolori, the present Clerk of the House of Representatives who therefore remains the next most senior officer in the services of the National Assembly will remain in service till 2021.”

Against the backdrop of reports that seven commissioners of the National Assembly service commission rejected Mohammed Sani-Omolori’s appointment as acting clerk of the National Assembly, one of the commissioners, Idi Adamu Ningi, has denied same saying he at no time rejected Omolori’s appointment.

Ningi, in a letter, had on April 19 declared support for Sani-Omolori’s appointment as acting clerk.
Also, the commissioner in a statement issued explained the circumstance which led to his signature being among those who rejected Omolori’s appointment.

According to him, the signatures of commissioners on the list taken were from an attendance sheet from a meeting which held between the commissioners and Senate President, Bukola Saraki, at his residence.

He said: “On Tuesday, 26th April, 2016, I was informed of a meeting of the Commission with His Excellency, the President of the Senate in his house at 7pm of that day. I and one of my colleague’s – Alhaji Rufai Tuta, arrived after 7pm, having missed our way trying to locate the Senate President’s house.

“On arrival, we met four of our colleagues already seated – Elder Yepwi, Funmilayo Lamuye, Paul Oweh and Joseph Oru. About five minutes later, His Excellency, the Senate President walked in and after exchanging pleasantries, he spoke about the way the issue of the appointment of the acting clerk to the National Assembly was handled by the Commission and essentially expressed displeasure about it.

“My colleagues, who all spoke before me, recalled their contributions at the meeting of the Commission where the decision on the appointment was taken. I spoke last and only offered apologies to His Excellency as it was apparent that he was not happy with the Commission; assuring him that we cannot annoy him intentionally.

“Mid-way into the meeting, the Deputy Senate President walked in and joined us. While I was speaking, one of my colleague (amongst the four we met at the residence) walked towards my seat with a sheet of paper which he gave to my colleague sitting close to me – Alhaji Rufai Tuta to sign and thereafter gave it to me. I noticed the paper was merely to write our name, the zone we represent and signature to indicate our attendance at the meeting and I signed accordingly.

Ningi continued: “I am therefore, shocked and surprised to learn that I signed a document. No document was presented at the meeting and I did not sign any document but an attendance sheet.

“I could not have signed any document dissociating myself from the decision of the Commission as I had earlier (on the 19th April, 2016) in a hand written note – attached – expressed my support for the appointment of Alhaji Sani Omolori as the Clerk to the National Assembly in acting capacity.

“Let me seize this opportunity to express my deep and sincere respect and loyalty to His Excellency, the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, and the Deputy President of the Senate – Mr. Ike Ekweremadu and to pledge my unflinching loyalty to and confidence on the Executive Chairman of the Commission – Dr. Adamu Mohammed Fika.”

But in a swift reaction, six out of the commissioners who attended the meeting with the Senate President lambasted Ningi saying he lied.
The commissioners in a counter statement issued described as unfortunate Ningi’s denial, adding that they were disappointed at his inability to stand by his word.

The statement read: ”It has come to our attention that a member of the commission, Idi Adamu Ningi, has denied rejecting the appointment of Mohammed Sani-Omolori as acting clerk of the National Assembly.

“It is unfortunate that he could speak from both sides of the mouth, an action which speaks of how much of a liar and traitor he is.
“We expect that a man of his age and standing should know better than to publicly deny a position he had earlier taken in the last meeting which held between us and the Senate President in the interest of the commission which has been brought to disrepute owing to the crisis rocking the commission.

“Moreso, to think that Idi Ningi could fall so cheap for financial inducement shows that he is not one to call a dependable ally, neither is he in anyway worthy of confidence. His recant demonstrates a lack of maturity that glaringly tells about his character. He is a betrayer and sellout,” the statement said.

AS it is now, the battle gets messier as both the political wing of the Senate and the commission is deep rooted in the battle of who will succeed Maikasuwa, Efeturi or Omolori?
Nigerian Pilot - Battle over who takes over from the incumbent clerk to the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa, appears to be getting out of hand as the Chairman of National Assembly Service Commission, Adamu Fika, has confronted the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, on why the appointment of Mohammed Sani-Omolori cannot be reversed.

Saraki had, in a letter last week, asked the Chairman of National Assembly Service Commission to reverse the appointment of Sani-Omolori as the acting clerk of National Assembly.

He rather asked the Commission to consider, Benedict Efeturi, the deputy acting clerk of National Assembly, for the position.

However, in response to Saraki’s letter, Fika said reversing the decision of the Commission appointing Sani-omolori as the acting Clerk to the National Assembly cannot be tenable because it is against the Nigerian Public Service rule.

In a memorandum he submitted to the 440th meeting of the Commission held on April 20, Fika explained that Efeturi was not appointed to the position because he would proceed on retirement leave on August 2.

He said in conformity with the convention and practices of the service, no officer who has less than six months to retire would act in higher office.

“Mr. Benedict Efeturi, who presently acts as Deputy Clerk to National Assembly, will also proceed on his three months terminal leave on 2nd August, 2016, days before the end of the current Clerk’s terminal leave,” he said, adding: “It is neither expedient nor in conformity with convention and practices of the Service for an officer who has less than six months left to retire from service to act in a higher office.

“Mr. Mohammed Sani-Omolori, the present Clerk of the House of Representatives who therefore remains the next most senior officer in the services of the National Assembly will remain in service till 2021.”

Against the backdrop of reports that seven commissioners of the National Assembly service commission rejected Mohammed Sani-Omolori’s appointment as acting clerk of the National Assembly, one of the commissioners, Idi Adamu Ningi, has denied same saying he at no time rejected Omolori’s appointment.

Ningi, in a letter, had on April 19 declared support for Sani-Omolori’s appointment as acting clerk.
Also, the commissioner in a statement issued explained the circumstance which led to his signature being among those who rejected Omolori’s appointment.

According to him, the signatures of commissioners on the list taken were from an attendance sheet from a meeting which held between the commissioners and Senate President, Bukola Saraki, at his residence.

He said: “On Tuesday, 26th April, 2016, I was informed of a meeting of the Commission with His Excellency, the President of the Senate in his house at 7pm of that day. I and one of my colleague’s – Alhaji Rufai Tuta, arrived after 7pm, having missed our way trying to locate the Senate President’s house.

“On arrival, we met four of our colleagues already seated – Elder Yepwi, Funmilayo Lamuye, Paul Oweh and Joseph Oru. About five minutes later, His Excellency, the Senate President walked in and after exchanging pleasantries, he spoke about the way the issue of the appointment of the acting clerk to the National Assembly was handled by the Commission and essentially expressed displeasure about it.

“My colleagues, who all spoke before me, recalled their contributions at the meeting of the Commission where the decision on the appointment was taken. I spoke last and only offered apologies to His Excellency as it was apparent that he was not happy with the Commission; assuring him that we cannot annoy him intentionally.

“Mid-way into the meeting, the Deputy Senate President walked in and joined us. While I was speaking, one of my colleague (amongst the four we met at the residence) walked towards my seat with a sheet of paper which he gave to my colleague sitting close to me – Alhaji Rufai Tuta to sign and thereafter gave it to me. I noticed the paper was merely to write our name, the zone we represent and signature to indicate our attendance at the meeting and I signed accordingly.

Ningi continued: “I am therefore, shocked and surprised to learn that I signed a document. No document was presented at the meeting and I did not sign any document but an attendance sheet.

“I could not have signed any document dissociating myself from the decision of the Commission as I had earlier (on the 19th April, 2016) in a hand written note – attached – expressed my support for the appointment of Alhaji Sani Omolori as the Clerk to the National Assembly in acting capacity.

“Let me seize this opportunity to express my deep and sincere respect and loyalty to His Excellency, the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, and the Deputy President of the Senate – Mr. Ike Ekweremadu and to pledge my unflinching loyalty to and confidence on the Executive Chairman of the Commission – Dr. Adamu Mohammed Fika.”

But in a swift reaction, six out of the commissioners who attended the meeting with the Senate President lambasted Ningi saying he lied.
The commissioners in a counter statement issued described as unfortunate Ningi’s denial, adding that they were disappointed at his inability to stand by his word.

The statement read: ”It has come to our attention that a member of the commission, Idi Adamu Ningi, has denied rejecting the appointment of Mohammed Sani-Omolori as acting clerk of the National Assembly.

“It is unfortunate that he could speak from both sides of the mouth, an action which speaks of how much of a liar and traitor he is.
“We expect that a man of his age and standing should know better than to publicly deny a position he had earlier taken in the last meeting which held between us and the Senate President in the interest of the commission which has been brought to disrepute owing to the crisis rocking the commission.

“Moreso, to think that Idi Ningi could fall so cheap for financial inducement shows that he is not one to call a dependable ally, neither is he in anyway worthy of confidence. His recant demonstrates a lack of maturity that glaringly tells about his character. He is a betrayer and sellout,” the statement said.

AS it is now, the battle gets messier as both the political wing of the Senate and the commission is deep rooted in the battle of who will succeed Maikasuwa, Efeturi or Omolori?

Saraki, Dogara Splits; Fight Dirty Over Budget Padding, NASS Clerk; The Untold Cold War'll Shock You

Saraki, Dogara Splits; Fight Dirty Over Budget Padding, NASS Clerk; The Untold Cold War'll Shock You

A serious cold war has reportedly brewed between the embattled President of the Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki and the House of Representatives counterpart, Speaker Yakubu Dogara over the recent imbroglio on the 2016 appropriation bill, which was said to be padded at the national assembly and the tussle over  who succeed the out-going assembly clerk, Mr. Salisu Maikasuwa, News Punch understands 

Report by Daily Independent  suggests that the leadership of the apex law making body of Nigeria from the side of the Commission (National Assembly Service Commission) on the one hand, and the political heads of the institution on the other are currently embroiled in another round of power tussle over who succeeds Mr. Salisu Maikasuwa as the next Clerk of the National Assembly (CNA). 

The controversy has refused to die down with new twists being added to the already invidious moves by politicians and bureaucratic eggheads. This is making the narrative of how not to make Mr. Benedict Efeturi, the current Deputy Clerk of National Assembly, the successor to Maikasuwa or why Mr. Mohammed Sani Omolori should not jump the gun to a position that some said is not rightly his, look like a very strategically-treacherous game of chess. 

While the latest but unconfirmed update coming from the Service Commission is that seven out of the 11 commissioners who were said to have initially voted for Omolori to be Acting Clerk have now written a counter-letter saying that Efeturi should be made acting Clerk. 

There are also indications that the leadership of the National Assembly is sharply divided over who should be the right successor. This is following feelers from both camps indicating that sides have being taken, leading to a certain cold war brewing between, Senator Bukola Saraki, the President of the Senate,  who is the chairman of the National Assembly, Hon. Yakubu Dogara, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, as well as Dr. Adamu Fika, the chairman of the Service Commission. 

First to beat the war drum was the latter who issued a letter of appointment to Mr. Omolori on April 20, 2016 informing him to prepare to take over from the retiring Salisu Maikasuwa, an act the Senate President saw as a slight and undermining his position by the commission’s chief executive. 

Saraki had according to the rejection letter written on his behalf by Isa Galaudu, his Chief of Staff,  insisted that the letter written to Omolori by the commission announcing his appointment be withdrawn forthwith. President of the Senate/Chairman, National Assembly had noted that Mr. Benedict Efeturi who is the current Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly but who still sits in the Senate Chamber during plenary, despite having a substantive Clerk of the Senate should instead be the one to be so appointed. 

However, in a returned fire by the commission via a memo dated  April 26, 2016, with reference number NASC/CHO/PS/II/II/28, the President of the Senate was told unequivocally that his desire to  reverse the appointment of Clerk to the House of Representatives, Sani Omolori,  as the Acting Clerk to the National Assembly was not possible. 

Sources within the Saraki camp disclosed anonymously to Independent that the commission was colluding with the outgoing Clerk and some highly placed politicians within the House of Reps and outside the National Assembly to take advantage of Saraki’s travail at the Code of Conduct Tribunal where he is on trial for False Asset declaration to hatch and push through their plans. 

A ranking lawmaker close to the embattled President of the Senate who spoke to our correspondent in confidence said: “We know all those behind this plot to undermine the person and office of the President of the Senate in an attempt to advance their own selfish interest of installing their own candidate without following due process. 

“We also know that there’s a script being acted out here from certain quarters within and outside the Assembly, but I want to assure you that the Senate President is unshaken and ready to take on any challenge that is placed on his way to achieving justice; be it at CCT or anywhere in this land."

“How can somebody who’s next in line for a post be shoved aside while the person under him would be made to become his boss when he has not committed any punishable offence just because some people believe he was wrongly promoted ahead of the other person or that he has just a few days left in active service? How does that disqualify the man? So, the Senate President is saying that even if it is for one day, they should allow him to act before his retirement, something that even the military will consider."

 “If anyone is to be punished for any offence, it should be the commission chairman and his commissioners who promoted Efeturi ahead of Omolori in 2014 knowing that Omolori was the right man to have been promoted to the post of DCNA. “Let Dr. Fika tell Nigerians the truth behind this matter and stop playing to the gallery,” the apparently angry source stated. 

Another angry lawmaker in the House of Representatives when contacted by our reporter stated that “Speaker Yakubu Dogara and some powerful Northerners outside the National Assembly are the ones bent on subverting the course of justice by denying a man what is rightly his, just like they did to James Faleke in Kogi. 

“There is this geo-political conspiracy going on to entrench a Northern agenda and the Speaker is part of it – we know. We all saw the behaviour of his aides the day the appointment letter announcing Omolori came. Some of them quickly scanned it and posted on social media. I was told, Turaki Hassan, his Media Adviser,  was even the one who circulated the said letter to you press men, shouldn’t that speak volume as to the interest of his principal in the whole matter?” the source who spoke anonymously queried. 

He questioned why the position of Clerk of the Assembly has continued to be dominated by people from the North since 1999 when they are not the only ones in the Civil Service. 

The said cold war between Saraki and Dogara is said to have also manifested in the handling of the budget impasse between the National Assembly and the Presidency with the former said to be very angry at his Reps counterpart for his refusal to corporate in an alleged move to override the President’s veto on the 2016 Appropriation Bill. 

An insider source anonymously disclosed to Independent that the Senate President had sought the concurrence of Speaker Dogara in a bid to override the President’s veto as the constitutionally stipulated period drew near expiration. But Speaker Dogara was said to have tactically taken side with the executive when he was quoted as saying in an event that “the National Assembly wouldn’t be overriding the President’s veto”, as he moved subsequently to interface with the President on behalf of the House with a view to resolving all grey areas identified by President Buhari. 

The move was said to have forced Senator Saraki who felt betrayed to back-pedal on his alleged plans to garner support from leadership of both Houses in a bid to actualise the veto override, thereby compelling him to go along with the interface which eventually led to the resolution of all differences relating to the budget. 


A serious cold war has reportedly brewed between the embattled President of the Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki and the House of Representatives counterpart, Speaker Yakubu Dogara over the recent imbroglio on the 2016 appropriation bill, which was said to be padded at the national assembly and the tussle over  who succeed the out-going assembly clerk, Mr. Salisu Maikasuwa, News Punch understands 

Report by Daily Independent  suggests that the leadership of the apex law making body of Nigeria from the side of the Commission (National Assembly Service Commission) on the one hand, and the political heads of the institution on the other are currently embroiled in another round of power tussle over who succeeds Mr. Salisu Maikasuwa as the next Clerk of the National Assembly (CNA). 

The controversy has refused to die down with new twists being added to the already invidious moves by politicians and bureaucratic eggheads. This is making the narrative of how not to make Mr. Benedict Efeturi, the current Deputy Clerk of National Assembly, the successor to Maikasuwa or why Mr. Mohammed Sani Omolori should not jump the gun to a position that some said is not rightly his, look like a very strategically-treacherous game of chess. 

While the latest but unconfirmed update coming from the Service Commission is that seven out of the 11 commissioners who were said to have initially voted for Omolori to be Acting Clerk have now written a counter-letter saying that Efeturi should be made acting Clerk. 

There are also indications that the leadership of the National Assembly is sharply divided over who should be the right successor. This is following feelers from both camps indicating that sides have being taken, leading to a certain cold war brewing between, Senator Bukola Saraki, the President of the Senate,  who is the chairman of the National Assembly, Hon. Yakubu Dogara, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, as well as Dr. Adamu Fika, the chairman of the Service Commission. 

First to beat the war drum was the latter who issued a letter of appointment to Mr. Omolori on April 20, 2016 informing him to prepare to take over from the retiring Salisu Maikasuwa, an act the Senate President saw as a slight and undermining his position by the commission’s chief executive. 

Saraki had according to the rejection letter written on his behalf by Isa Galaudu, his Chief of Staff,  insisted that the letter written to Omolori by the commission announcing his appointment be withdrawn forthwith. President of the Senate/Chairman, National Assembly had noted that Mr. Benedict Efeturi who is the current Deputy Clerk to the National Assembly but who still sits in the Senate Chamber during plenary, despite having a substantive Clerk of the Senate should instead be the one to be so appointed. 

However, in a returned fire by the commission via a memo dated  April 26, 2016, with reference number NASC/CHO/PS/II/II/28, the President of the Senate was told unequivocally that his desire to  reverse the appointment of Clerk to the House of Representatives, Sani Omolori,  as the Acting Clerk to the National Assembly was not possible. 

Sources within the Saraki camp disclosed anonymously to Independent that the commission was colluding with the outgoing Clerk and some highly placed politicians within the House of Reps and outside the National Assembly to take advantage of Saraki’s travail at the Code of Conduct Tribunal where he is on trial for False Asset declaration to hatch and push through their plans. 

A ranking lawmaker close to the embattled President of the Senate who spoke to our correspondent in confidence said: “We know all those behind this plot to undermine the person and office of the President of the Senate in an attempt to advance their own selfish interest of installing their own candidate without following due process. 

“We also know that there’s a script being acted out here from certain quarters within and outside the Assembly, but I want to assure you that the Senate President is unshaken and ready to take on any challenge that is placed on his way to achieving justice; be it at CCT or anywhere in this land."

“How can somebody who’s next in line for a post be shoved aside while the person under him would be made to become his boss when he has not committed any punishable offence just because some people believe he was wrongly promoted ahead of the other person or that he has just a few days left in active service? How does that disqualify the man? So, the Senate President is saying that even if it is for one day, they should allow him to act before his retirement, something that even the military will consider."

 “If anyone is to be punished for any offence, it should be the commission chairman and his commissioners who promoted Efeturi ahead of Omolori in 2014 knowing that Omolori was the right man to have been promoted to the post of DCNA. “Let Dr. Fika tell Nigerians the truth behind this matter and stop playing to the gallery,” the apparently angry source stated. 

Another angry lawmaker in the House of Representatives when contacted by our reporter stated that “Speaker Yakubu Dogara and some powerful Northerners outside the National Assembly are the ones bent on subverting the course of justice by denying a man what is rightly his, just like they did to James Faleke in Kogi. 

“There is this geo-political conspiracy going on to entrench a Northern agenda and the Speaker is part of it – we know. We all saw the behaviour of his aides the day the appointment letter announcing Omolori came. Some of them quickly scanned it and posted on social media. I was told, Turaki Hassan, his Media Adviser,  was even the one who circulated the said letter to you press men, shouldn’t that speak volume as to the interest of his principal in the whole matter?” the source who spoke anonymously queried. 

He questioned why the position of Clerk of the Assembly has continued to be dominated by people from the North since 1999 when they are not the only ones in the Civil Service. 

The said cold war between Saraki and Dogara is said to have also manifested in the handling of the budget impasse between the National Assembly and the Presidency with the former said to be very angry at his Reps counterpart for his refusal to corporate in an alleged move to override the President’s veto on the 2016 Appropriation Bill. 

An insider source anonymously disclosed to Independent that the Senate President had sought the concurrence of Speaker Dogara in a bid to override the President’s veto as the constitutionally stipulated period drew near expiration. But Speaker Dogara was said to have tactically taken side with the executive when he was quoted as saying in an event that “the National Assembly wouldn’t be overriding the President’s veto”, as he moved subsequently to interface with the President on behalf of the House with a view to resolving all grey areas identified by President Buhari. 

The move was said to have forced Senator Saraki who felt betrayed to back-pedal on his alleged plans to garner support from leadership of both Houses in a bid to actualise the veto override, thereby compelling him to go along with the interface which eventually led to the resolution of all differences relating to the budget. 


NASS Commission Humbles Saraki, REJECTS the Senate President's Order On NASS Clerk

NASS Commission Humbles Saraki, REJECTS the Senate President's Order On NASS Clerk

The President of the upper legislative arm of Nigeria, the Senate has been humiliated as his order to reverse the newly appointed clerk of the National Assembly rejected.

True to News Punch earlier report that the embattled Senate President will have an upheaval task to contend with the Federal Government over his decision to give fresh order on the appointment of Sani Omolori as the new clerk of the National Assembly, the National Assembly Service Commission (NASC), yesterday, rejected a directive from Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki to reverse the appointment of Mr. Mohammed Sani – Omolori, as the new acting Clerk to the National Assembly (CNA), the Daily Sun Newspaper reported


But, Saraki said Maikasuwa was expected to be succeeded by his deputy, Mr. Benedict Efeturi, in an acting capacity until August when he is expected to proceed on his own terminal leave.

The Senate President directed the commission to withdraw the letter of appointment already issued to Sani-Omolori, and write a fresh one for Efeturi immediately.

However, NASC Executive Chairman, Mr. Adamu Fika, in a letter addressed to Saraki, said it was not possible because it would be improper to do so being that Sani – Omolori was senior to Efeturi, who is also not supposed to be appointed in acting capacity since he would retire soon.

Fika said: “I wish to refer to your letter on the above subject matter issued on your behalf by your Chief of Staff, Senator Isa Galaudu. The letter was instructing the executive chairman, National Assembly Service Commission to withdraw the letter appointing Mr. Mohammed A. Sani-Omolori as the acting clerk of the National Assembly for the period that the incumbent clerk to the National Assembly will be on pre-retirement leave from May 14 to August 14, 2016.

“The above decision was taken at the commission’s 440th meeting held on April 20, 2016.

“The commission took into account the fact that Efeturi will himself proceed on his pre-retirement leave on August 20, 2016, 12 days before the incumbent clerk will be due to hand over to his successor.

“This means that Efeturi is time barred for the acting appointment.

“Hence, the choice of Mr. Sani-Omolori to act and ensure continuity in that very important public service office where he will serve for the next five years.”

Fika said he did not even use his voting right in arriving at the commission’s decision, because 11 commissioners were in support of the decision.

“It should be noted that in Nigeria public service, seniority is determined at the time of consideration for promotion and career progression chart leading to it.

“Seniority is never decided by the date of appointment to the service nor date of retirement.”
The President of the upper legislative arm of Nigeria, the Senate has been humiliated as his order to reverse the newly appointed clerk of the National Assembly rejected.

True to News Punch earlier report that the embattled Senate President will have an upheaval task to contend with the Federal Government over his decision to give fresh order on the appointment of Sani Omolori as the new clerk of the National Assembly, the National Assembly Service Commission (NASC), yesterday, rejected a directive from Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki to reverse the appointment of Mr. Mohammed Sani – Omolori, as the new acting Clerk to the National Assembly (CNA), the Daily Sun Newspaper reported


But, Saraki said Maikasuwa was expected to be succeeded by his deputy, Mr. Benedict Efeturi, in an acting capacity until August when he is expected to proceed on his own terminal leave.

The Senate President directed the commission to withdraw the letter of appointment already issued to Sani-Omolori, and write a fresh one for Efeturi immediately.

However, NASC Executive Chairman, Mr. Adamu Fika, in a letter addressed to Saraki, said it was not possible because it would be improper to do so being that Sani – Omolori was senior to Efeturi, who is also not supposed to be appointed in acting capacity since he would retire soon.

Fika said: “I wish to refer to your letter on the above subject matter issued on your behalf by your Chief of Staff, Senator Isa Galaudu. The letter was instructing the executive chairman, National Assembly Service Commission to withdraw the letter appointing Mr. Mohammed A. Sani-Omolori as the acting clerk of the National Assembly for the period that the incumbent clerk to the National Assembly will be on pre-retirement leave from May 14 to August 14, 2016.

“The above decision was taken at the commission’s 440th meeting held on April 20, 2016.

“The commission took into account the fact that Efeturi will himself proceed on his pre-retirement leave on August 20, 2016, 12 days before the incumbent clerk will be due to hand over to his successor.

“This means that Efeturi is time barred for the acting appointment.

“Hence, the choice of Mr. Sani-Omolori to act and ensure continuity in that very important public service office where he will serve for the next five years.”

Fika said he did not even use his voting right in arriving at the commission’s decision, because 11 commissioners were in support of the decision.

“It should be noted that in Nigeria public service, seniority is determined at the time of consideration for promotion and career progression chart leading to it.

“Seniority is never decided by the date of appointment to the service nor date of retirement.”

Trending

randomposts

Like Us

fb/https://www.facebook.com/newsproof
google.com, pub-6536761625640326, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0