Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky - News Proof

News:

Politics

Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky


Showing posts with label Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky. Show all posts

All Eyes On Harun Elbinawi By: Gabriel Onoja

All Eyes On Harun Elbinawi By: Gabriel Onoja

shiite Harun Elbinawi
Harun Elbinawi (May God expose his many treacheries) appears to have totally lost it. His timeline on Twitter reads like what it is, a terrorist propaganda bulletin aimed at inciting people to the point of signing up for a jihad. On Monday February 20, 2017 he tweeted from his handle, @ELBINAWI that "These 3 evil men @MBuhari @elrufai @Buratai_COAS murdered 1000+ Nigerians & dumped their bodies in mass graves." 

On the surface the tweet appeared innocuous, something from another jobless nonentity looking to catch some fun from trolling highly placed people, but it is far from that. Taken in isolation or in context of other tweets in the preceding and following hours, Elbinawi's outburst exposes his true intentions. His tweet is part of a more complex and strategic messaging aimed at whipping up anti-government sentiments, perhaps in preparation for some other actual actions on the ground. 


First, the supposed murder he referred to was the fallout from when members of his outlawed Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) confronted the Nigerian Army in December of 2015. The resulting military operation drew public criticisms over what those that initially did not have the entire information described as disproportionately hard response to the foolhardiness of IMN radicalized youths. A Judicial Panel of Inquiry set up by the Kaduna State government cleary indicted IMN for provoking crises and of being militarized in violation of the law just as it also apportioned blame to the military where necessary. 

It is this past episode that Elbinawi wanted to pass off in his tweet in a manner that suggests the events just occurred or are ongoing. The dubiousness of this act is appreciated when one realizes that the tweets were interspersed with other tweets about the Southern Kaduna killings by suspected herdsmen. The unwary would likely be misled into thinking there was an ongoing pogrom if they do not discover the duplicity. 

Secondly, the Twitter associates of Elbinawi should give right thinking people concerns same as the intention of his tweets. In addition to the desperate bid to criminalize the government and the Army – consistent with the IMN eschewing everything that is secular, this individual is also trying to broker an alliance between his outlawed group and another criminal entity, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), whose leader, Nnamdi Kanu is standing trial for a string of crimes against the country. Any previous claims to peaceful agitation has been negated by these tweets as they practically urge insurrection against the government and the Nigerian state.

Curiously, the only thing that unites Elbinawi's envisaged alliance is criminality as depicted in his photo mashup of IPOB's Nnamdi Kanu; IMN Leader – Sheik Ibraheem ElZakyzaky, who was indicted for inciting the December 2015 clashes with the Army; and disgraced former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, who is standing trial for one of the most brazen case of theft of public funds originally meant for buying arms to fight terrorists and insurgents. These, in this man's perverted estimate, are the oppressed for whom Nigerians should rise up for against the government. 
These preceding aberrations may look frightening but they are nothing compared to Elbinawi's expansion into seeking international dimension for his erratic views, and from the look of things, his envisaged actions. It is okay to have sympathy for a country like Iran but not when that nation has consistently demonstrated that it will happily sabotage Nigeria for its own ends. 

Again, the retort would be that there is nothing wrong in being sympathetic to a country that is being hounded by foreign influences. The only problem? Iran is the one doing the hounding in this instance. From backing Houthi rebels in Yemen to financing IMN in Nigeria, its sponsorship of extremism and terrorism is not a new topic and its activities are worrisome enough for Saudi Arabia and Israel to form an unlikely alliance to counter Iranian export of terrorism. 

This alliance is another of Elbinawi's many headaches and the reason is not far fetched. It will ultimately thwart a plan that Elbinawi is likely a part of, an Iranian plot to scale up its activities. The authorities in Nigeria must on this account pay attention and keep this fellow under watch because a few days ago another IMN propagandist retweeted the request "Is there any company in Abuja that is willing to hire a refugee from Yemen, that specifically wants to seek asylum in Nigeria to escape war?"⁠⁠⁠⁠ 

The connections are clear here: Iran, patron of IMN, is sponsoring Houthi rebels in Yemen; a request comes in for any company that will hire Yemeni refugees; and the next thing is that Elbinawi sparked a Twitter frenzy to whip up sentiments against the government and the Nigerian Army while alleging a global anti-Shiite sentiment. 

With the activation of Elbinawi for the next phase of whatever the IMN agenda is in the country, what will follow next? Would his rallying cry on Twitter provoke the next round of attacks on security and military agencies? Would Iranian trained Houthi terrorists use the cover of being refugees to sneak into Nigeria and carry out attacks on behalf of IMN? Would the so called refugees come into Nigeria to pass on Iranian-imparted fighting skills to IMN's radicalized members in line with their threat that the country would burn? Would the refugees turn out to be Iranian-trained Houthi commandos that would attempt to spring ElZakyzaky from detention? Harun Elbinawi should know.

Onoja, is National Co-ordinator, Coalition Against TERRORISM and Extremism in Nigeria and contributed the piece from Jos.
shiite Harun Elbinawi
Harun Elbinawi (May God expose his many treacheries) appears to have totally lost it. His timeline on Twitter reads like what it is, a terrorist propaganda bulletin aimed at inciting people to the point of signing up for a jihad. On Monday February 20, 2017 he tweeted from his handle, @ELBINAWI that "These 3 evil men @MBuhari @elrufai @Buratai_COAS murdered 1000+ Nigerians & dumped their bodies in mass graves." 

On the surface the tweet appeared innocuous, something from another jobless nonentity looking to catch some fun from trolling highly placed people, but it is far from that. Taken in isolation or in context of other tweets in the preceding and following hours, Elbinawi's outburst exposes his true intentions. His tweet is part of a more complex and strategic messaging aimed at whipping up anti-government sentiments, perhaps in preparation for some other actual actions on the ground. 


First, the supposed murder he referred to was the fallout from when members of his outlawed Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) confronted the Nigerian Army in December of 2015. The resulting military operation drew public criticisms over what those that initially did not have the entire information described as disproportionately hard response to the foolhardiness of IMN radicalized youths. A Judicial Panel of Inquiry set up by the Kaduna State government cleary indicted IMN for provoking crises and of being militarized in violation of the law just as it also apportioned blame to the military where necessary. 

It is this past episode that Elbinawi wanted to pass off in his tweet in a manner that suggests the events just occurred or are ongoing. The dubiousness of this act is appreciated when one realizes that the tweets were interspersed with other tweets about the Southern Kaduna killings by suspected herdsmen. The unwary would likely be misled into thinking there was an ongoing pogrom if they do not discover the duplicity. 

Secondly, the Twitter associates of Elbinawi should give right thinking people concerns same as the intention of his tweets. In addition to the desperate bid to criminalize the government and the Army – consistent with the IMN eschewing everything that is secular, this individual is also trying to broker an alliance between his outlawed group and another criminal entity, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), whose leader, Nnamdi Kanu is standing trial for a string of crimes against the country. Any previous claims to peaceful agitation has been negated by these tweets as they practically urge insurrection against the government and the Nigerian state.

Curiously, the only thing that unites Elbinawi's envisaged alliance is criminality as depicted in his photo mashup of IPOB's Nnamdi Kanu; IMN Leader – Sheik Ibraheem ElZakyzaky, who was indicted for inciting the December 2015 clashes with the Army; and disgraced former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, who is standing trial for one of the most brazen case of theft of public funds originally meant for buying arms to fight terrorists and insurgents. These, in this man's perverted estimate, are the oppressed for whom Nigerians should rise up for against the government. 
These preceding aberrations may look frightening but they are nothing compared to Elbinawi's expansion into seeking international dimension for his erratic views, and from the look of things, his envisaged actions. It is okay to have sympathy for a country like Iran but not when that nation has consistently demonstrated that it will happily sabotage Nigeria for its own ends. 

Again, the retort would be that there is nothing wrong in being sympathetic to a country that is being hounded by foreign influences. The only problem? Iran is the one doing the hounding in this instance. From backing Houthi rebels in Yemen to financing IMN in Nigeria, its sponsorship of extremism and terrorism is not a new topic and its activities are worrisome enough for Saudi Arabia and Israel to form an unlikely alliance to counter Iranian export of terrorism. 

This alliance is another of Elbinawi's many headaches and the reason is not far fetched. It will ultimately thwart a plan that Elbinawi is likely a part of, an Iranian plot to scale up its activities. The authorities in Nigeria must on this account pay attention and keep this fellow under watch because a few days ago another IMN propagandist retweeted the request "Is there any company in Abuja that is willing to hire a refugee from Yemen, that specifically wants to seek asylum in Nigeria to escape war?"⁠⁠⁠⁠ 

The connections are clear here: Iran, patron of IMN, is sponsoring Houthi rebels in Yemen; a request comes in for any company that will hire Yemeni refugees; and the next thing is that Elbinawi sparked a Twitter frenzy to whip up sentiments against the government and the Nigerian Army while alleging a global anti-Shiite sentiment. 

With the activation of Elbinawi for the next phase of whatever the IMN agenda is in the country, what will follow next? Would his rallying cry on Twitter provoke the next round of attacks on security and military agencies? Would Iranian trained Houthi terrorists use the cover of being refugees to sneak into Nigeria and carry out attacks on behalf of IMN? Would the so called refugees come into Nigeria to pass on Iranian-imparted fighting skills to IMN's radicalized members in line with their threat that the country would burn? Would the refugees turn out to be Iranian-trained Houthi commandos that would attempt to spring ElZakyzaky from detention? Harun Elbinawi should know.

Onoja, is National Co-ordinator, Coalition Against TERRORISM and Extremism in Nigeria and contributed the piece from Jos.

The Shi'a Victim Syndrome, Paid Mourners and Dangerous Propaganda, By Gabriel Onoja

The Shi'a Victim Syndrome, Paid Mourners and Dangerous Propaganda, By Gabriel Onoja

The Shi'a Victim Syndrome, Paid Mourners and Dangerous Propaganda,  By Gabriel Onoja
The Shi'a sect's manifestation in Nigeria: the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN),has apparently been ramping up its propaganda.Its strategy has improved to now include delivering its version of the truth using respectable clerics, editorials of respected online publications, talking heads that saturate the airwaves and columnists that seemingly appear to be writing across the divides. 

One of the latter category,Chris Ngwodo, penned a write up "Nigeria’s War Against the Shi’a" which perfectly fits into the new slant of covertly threatening the nation to accept IMN's excesses without the extremist group having to tone down its own insurrection against the secular state.Like all the other formats of the newfound strategy,the new approach adopted by the Shi'a sect is drawing on an asset they had the foresight to set up,their convoluted accounts of past events are now being quoted by those newly deployed to manage their propaganda efforts. 


True to a time worn IMN strategy of blaming just about everyone but themselves,Ngwodo's article in one breath blamed President Muhammadu Buhari's administration for a phantom Shi'a ordeal while in the same breath acknowledged that they had a run-in with the law in 2014 when a different government held sway. In the traditional disdain the group has for anything related to constituted authority, security agencies that acted to contain the excesses of a belligerent group and those who dared exercise their rights to speak against IMN extremism were described as "extremist voices" and "monsters". 

The piece tried to confuse the issues in IMN's December 2015 confrontation of the Army when it said President Buhari tacitly justified the massacres. It may be a topic for another day and another context but it is fraudulent to describe attackers that died in a counter-military operation as massacred. The ones that survived among them should be answering charges for using helpless women and underaged youths as human shields. 

The writer alluded to a Nigerian state that has "escalated its hostility against the Islamic Movement in Nigeria" since the 2015 incident as a prelude to dismissing the genuine efforts made in getting to the root of that crisis.It did admitted that the Judicial Panel of Inquiry set up by the Kaduna State government indicted both the army and the IMN,it sidestepped the report of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC),which was unequivocal in placing the blame on the leadership and members of IMN.That report specifically demanded the immediate trial of IMN leader,Sheikh El-Zakyzaky for precipitating what Ngwodo termed "massacre". 

The import of two separate but related events were lost on the author of that pro-IMN missive.First,the decision of Katsina,Kano and Kebbi states to follow in the footsteps of Kaduna state in outlawing the IMN is apparently the product of popular demand that other states will do well to emulate. No group has the right to plague persons of other faiths and convictions and not expect the state to step in as an umpire. Secondly,the condemnable attacks on Shi'a Kaduna,Funtua, Sokoto,Kano and Jos should give members of the group and their paid commentators cause to ponder what they did wrong to provoke such morbid outrage among other nationals. 

Describing these development as "state-backed systematic persecution and extermination of the Shi’a" is therefore disingenuous and the true hallmark of bigotry. Several fundamentals might have simmered beneath the surface over the years but where one of the parties to the situation decides to escalate aggression,it will take an irresponsible government not to act in the collective interest of all citizens,which in this case implies that the rest must be protected from the aggression of the errant group.No one has said the Shi'a cannot practice what they hold dear,but they must also recognize by the same token that the rest of the country have the right not to be coerced into Shi'a doctrine's. 

The writer of the referenced piece,if he is above 45 years old,may wish to cast his mind back to when he was younger and see if there was so much noise about sectarian differences in Islam.If he is a younger person he should ask those who should know.What he referred to as "anti-Shi’a prejudice" has more to do with the responses of states and individuals to IMN aggression.To then try whipping up anti-Sunni prejudice in response to anti-Shi'a prejudice is to be himself guilty of what he is preaching against.If he takes a sincere reality check,he will realize that there is a growing disenchantment with the faiths and sects that are driven offshore.Even if such disenchantment were in its early stage,the pursuit of secularism is what will work for Nigerians and not foreign funded and driven divisions,as he correctly observed at some illuminating point in his article. 

That illumination was however absent when it claimed that IMN members only held peaceful protest marches that were then attacked by mobs and security forces.Such claims could only be made by someone that has never had a taste of the horrors that the Shi'a outfit is capable of inflicting.

The Charges against the Shi’a 
This capability of the IMN was at the root of outlawing the group. Once it has gotten to the point where it openly took on the Army and even reportedly made an attempt on the life of the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) it became glaring that the nation was not dealing with a ragtag of urchins.Outlawing the IMN in Kaduna state by the Governor,Mallam Nasir El Rufai was a logical step.As the order noted, IMN does not acknowledge the Nigerian state,a fact demonstrated by it not bothering with registration; the group was militarized,it preaches extremism while its members had remained confrontational and unruly in the aftermath of the 2015 incident. 

Other groups may hold similar views in their closet but they will get a taste of the state when they escalate matters to the level of the IMN. Boko Haram has tried it and they now know better.The oil militants have tried it and they are walking back their folly. 

That El ZakZaky,the IMN leader once take pro-constitutional and pro-state stances does not rule out the possibility of recanting and denying the primacy of the secular Nigerian state.If he once spoke for constitutionality and then more recently opted to fight the institutions and concepts enshrined in the constitution, the previous views expressed are no protection to shield him from security agencies that must do their work. 

This is a mistake that the political class must not repeat.They have in the past allowed demagogic sects to fester and only acted when it was too late.Criticisms like the ones unloaded by Ngwodo must not petrify them from blocking the ride of another extremist group.When IMN take over public spaces with their processions to the discomfort of others it is a matter of time before the will raise flags,claim territories and enforce their own version of reality.Now that it is known that no sect or faith should hijack state infrastructure,we must move to the next state of stopping Friday prayers and Sunday services from obstructing the roads.

The Strange Politics of Anti-Shi’a Activism 
It is indeed strange that Shi’as are minority in one paragraph and they become strategic to El Rufai,Buhari,and the All Progressives Congress winning elections.Since their numbers can swing votes then they are not in the minority,at least not on the scale they're marketing to the world. They should thus exploit the strength of their numbers at the polls and that is if they are willing to recognize,held by the Nigerian state.

Sowing the Wind of Extremism 
It is for the precise reason that Nigeria should not be proxy battle ground for the Middle East that it becomes imperative for the Government of The Federal Republic of Nigeria to counter external influences here. If the wind of extremism is being sown in Nigeria the proof have been traced to Iran as state sponsor of terrorism – cache of arms uncovered,spies arrested in Lagos,financial ties with IMN and other smoking guns.Once Saudi Arabia can be implicated even on a smaller scale,any group they are financing would have a run-in with the law. 

It must be noted that it is the institutions of state like the Nigerian Army that have been at the forefront of the anti-terror fight and the IMN has done a lot to attempt tarnishing such entities using Amnesty International and Islamic Human Rights Commission. 

The military has not relented in doing the needful apparently because there is that commitment to ensure that replication of the Middle East kind of chaos would not work here irrespective of how much IMN or any other group assigned to make it happen does. 

Ngwodo apparently managed to let slip an agreed talking points for the new IMN propaganda onslaught.It is that claim that the other Muslim sects and Christians would be the next in the firing line once the Shi'as have been disposed of. He even found an opportunity to remind readers of ethnic cleansing and genocide in one desperate attempt at fear mongering. 

Protecting Minorities and Securing Democracy. 
Minorities need not take up arms in response to this unwarranted fear mongering.The first protection that minorities – be they ethnic, religious or sectarian – need is to be shielded from the danger posed by IMN.Beyond making life unbearable for everyone,the sect has been promoting the idea that insurrections can be carried out without consequences.No minority group should buy into this fallacy. Rising up against the state is never the best option. 

To protect minorities and secure democracy,what is needed is to prevail on President Muhammadu Buhari not to relent in ridding the country of all forms of extremism since it is now clear that Boko Haram is not the only fanatical group.If Mr President can do this for Nigeria then his legacy is secured.

Onoja writes from Jos.

The Shi'a Victim Syndrome, Paid Mourners and Dangerous Propaganda,  By Gabriel Onoja
The Shi'a sect's manifestation in Nigeria: the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN),has apparently been ramping up its propaganda.Its strategy has improved to now include delivering its version of the truth using respectable clerics, editorials of respected online publications, talking heads that saturate the airwaves and columnists that seemingly appear to be writing across the divides. 

One of the latter category,Chris Ngwodo, penned a write up "Nigeria’s War Against the Shi’a" which perfectly fits into the new slant of covertly threatening the nation to accept IMN's excesses without the extremist group having to tone down its own insurrection against the secular state.Like all the other formats of the newfound strategy,the new approach adopted by the Shi'a sect is drawing on an asset they had the foresight to set up,their convoluted accounts of past events are now being quoted by those newly deployed to manage their propaganda efforts. 


True to a time worn IMN strategy of blaming just about everyone but themselves,Ngwodo's article in one breath blamed President Muhammadu Buhari's administration for a phantom Shi'a ordeal while in the same breath acknowledged that they had a run-in with the law in 2014 when a different government held sway. In the traditional disdain the group has for anything related to constituted authority, security agencies that acted to contain the excesses of a belligerent group and those who dared exercise their rights to speak against IMN extremism were described as "extremist voices" and "monsters". 

The piece tried to confuse the issues in IMN's December 2015 confrontation of the Army when it said President Buhari tacitly justified the massacres. It may be a topic for another day and another context but it is fraudulent to describe attackers that died in a counter-military operation as massacred. The ones that survived among them should be answering charges for using helpless women and underaged youths as human shields. 

The writer alluded to a Nigerian state that has "escalated its hostility against the Islamic Movement in Nigeria" since the 2015 incident as a prelude to dismissing the genuine efforts made in getting to the root of that crisis.It did admitted that the Judicial Panel of Inquiry set up by the Kaduna State government indicted both the army and the IMN,it sidestepped the report of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC),which was unequivocal in placing the blame on the leadership and members of IMN.That report specifically demanded the immediate trial of IMN leader,Sheikh El-Zakyzaky for precipitating what Ngwodo termed "massacre". 

The import of two separate but related events were lost on the author of that pro-IMN missive.First,the decision of Katsina,Kano and Kebbi states to follow in the footsteps of Kaduna state in outlawing the IMN is apparently the product of popular demand that other states will do well to emulate. No group has the right to plague persons of other faiths and convictions and not expect the state to step in as an umpire. Secondly,the condemnable attacks on Shi'a Kaduna,Funtua, Sokoto,Kano and Jos should give members of the group and their paid commentators cause to ponder what they did wrong to provoke such morbid outrage among other nationals. 

Describing these development as "state-backed systematic persecution and extermination of the Shi’a" is therefore disingenuous and the true hallmark of bigotry. Several fundamentals might have simmered beneath the surface over the years but where one of the parties to the situation decides to escalate aggression,it will take an irresponsible government not to act in the collective interest of all citizens,which in this case implies that the rest must be protected from the aggression of the errant group.No one has said the Shi'a cannot practice what they hold dear,but they must also recognize by the same token that the rest of the country have the right not to be coerced into Shi'a doctrine's. 

The writer of the referenced piece,if he is above 45 years old,may wish to cast his mind back to when he was younger and see if there was so much noise about sectarian differences in Islam.If he is a younger person he should ask those who should know.What he referred to as "anti-Shi’a prejudice" has more to do with the responses of states and individuals to IMN aggression.To then try whipping up anti-Sunni prejudice in response to anti-Shi'a prejudice is to be himself guilty of what he is preaching against.If he takes a sincere reality check,he will realize that there is a growing disenchantment with the faiths and sects that are driven offshore.Even if such disenchantment were in its early stage,the pursuit of secularism is what will work for Nigerians and not foreign funded and driven divisions,as he correctly observed at some illuminating point in his article. 

That illumination was however absent when it claimed that IMN members only held peaceful protest marches that were then attacked by mobs and security forces.Such claims could only be made by someone that has never had a taste of the horrors that the Shi'a outfit is capable of inflicting.

The Charges against the Shi’a 
This capability of the IMN was at the root of outlawing the group. Once it has gotten to the point where it openly took on the Army and even reportedly made an attempt on the life of the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) it became glaring that the nation was not dealing with a ragtag of urchins.Outlawing the IMN in Kaduna state by the Governor,Mallam Nasir El Rufai was a logical step.As the order noted, IMN does not acknowledge the Nigerian state,a fact demonstrated by it not bothering with registration; the group was militarized,it preaches extremism while its members had remained confrontational and unruly in the aftermath of the 2015 incident. 

Other groups may hold similar views in their closet but they will get a taste of the state when they escalate matters to the level of the IMN. Boko Haram has tried it and they now know better.The oil militants have tried it and they are walking back their folly. 

That El ZakZaky,the IMN leader once take pro-constitutional and pro-state stances does not rule out the possibility of recanting and denying the primacy of the secular Nigerian state.If he once spoke for constitutionality and then more recently opted to fight the institutions and concepts enshrined in the constitution, the previous views expressed are no protection to shield him from security agencies that must do their work. 

This is a mistake that the political class must not repeat.They have in the past allowed demagogic sects to fester and only acted when it was too late.Criticisms like the ones unloaded by Ngwodo must not petrify them from blocking the ride of another extremist group.When IMN take over public spaces with their processions to the discomfort of others it is a matter of time before the will raise flags,claim territories and enforce their own version of reality.Now that it is known that no sect or faith should hijack state infrastructure,we must move to the next state of stopping Friday prayers and Sunday services from obstructing the roads.

The Strange Politics of Anti-Shi’a Activism 
It is indeed strange that Shi’as are minority in one paragraph and they become strategic to El Rufai,Buhari,and the All Progressives Congress winning elections.Since their numbers can swing votes then they are not in the minority,at least not on the scale they're marketing to the world. They should thus exploit the strength of their numbers at the polls and that is if they are willing to recognize,held by the Nigerian state.

Sowing the Wind of Extremism 
It is for the precise reason that Nigeria should not be proxy battle ground for the Middle East that it becomes imperative for the Government of The Federal Republic of Nigeria to counter external influences here. If the wind of extremism is being sown in Nigeria the proof have been traced to Iran as state sponsor of terrorism – cache of arms uncovered,spies arrested in Lagos,financial ties with IMN and other smoking guns.Once Saudi Arabia can be implicated even on a smaller scale,any group they are financing would have a run-in with the law. 

It must be noted that it is the institutions of state like the Nigerian Army that have been at the forefront of the anti-terror fight and the IMN has done a lot to attempt tarnishing such entities using Amnesty International and Islamic Human Rights Commission. 

The military has not relented in doing the needful apparently because there is that commitment to ensure that replication of the Middle East kind of chaos would not work here irrespective of how much IMN or any other group assigned to make it happen does. 

Ngwodo apparently managed to let slip an agreed talking points for the new IMN propaganda onslaught.It is that claim that the other Muslim sects and Christians would be the next in the firing line once the Shi'as have been disposed of. He even found an opportunity to remind readers of ethnic cleansing and genocide in one desperate attempt at fear mongering. 

Protecting Minorities and Securing Democracy. 
Minorities need not take up arms in response to this unwarranted fear mongering.The first protection that minorities – be they ethnic, religious or sectarian – need is to be shielded from the danger posed by IMN.Beyond making life unbearable for everyone,the sect has been promoting the idea that insurrections can be carried out without consequences.No minority group should buy into this fallacy. Rising up against the state is never the best option. 

To protect minorities and secure democracy,what is needed is to prevail on President Muhammadu Buhari not to relent in ridding the country of all forms of extremism since it is now clear that Boko Haram is not the only fanatical group.If Mr President can do this for Nigeria then his legacy is secured.

Onoja writes from Jos.

Re: Nigeria Must Not Transform The Shiites Into Enemies, By Abiodun Israel

Re: Nigeria Must Not Transform The Shiites Into Enemies, By Abiodun Israel

Islamic Movement in Nigeria
The editorial of any newspaper is a powerful tool. It often gives insight into the position that an organisation takes on crucial national issues and its pronouncements are usually tempered by measured caution to ensure that the newspaper does not lose its credibility or respect among readers. It is equally imperative that editorials take the additional precaution of not been seen to endorse criminal or volatile positions so that the proponents of such do not cite the newspaper as the source of their authority in commission of further crimes.


This understanding was not lost on a respectable online newspaper that published an editorial "Nigeria Must Not Transform The Shiites Into Enemies" on Friday October 21, 2016 in which it tenuously attempted to make a case for the Shiites in Nigeria as typified by the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) to continue undermining the state. The editorial also tried to criminalise not just the Nigerian state but also strategic institutions like the Nigerian Army and the Judicial Commission of Inquiry set up by the Kaduna state government to investigate a deadly IMN-Army clash in December 2015.

Read in isolation, the editorial in question is a wake up call that would challenge even the most obtuse government. The other stories, features and opinion articles that the newspaper had been running in recent times however took the wind out of its official position as the direction of the editorial fits smugly into what has been canvassed by supposedly independent contributors. It therefore oozes of being part of a larger communication campaign that is meant to catalyse particular actions.

Before the entire country becomes enslaved to a vocal minority, it is vital to correct some wrong premises advanced in the recent array of write ups like the editorial. The imperative to correct the misimpressions becomes even more urgent upon the realisation that in this age where researchers rely on internet searches, there is a concert effort to saturate the online servers with wrong information that would in the nearest future be referenced as facts.

When citing recent incidents around the IMN in the course of discussing the need for religious tolerance, protection of minorities and respect for human rights, it is important to resist the temptation to set out portraying the group with its members as victims and the rest of the country as aggressors. The inherent danger in doing this is that the infractions, shortcomings and crimes committed by the militant or extremists wings of the IMN are glossed over and they go away with the impression that they have done no wrong. It becomes more dangerous when other groups or even the moderate elements of the IMN are encouraged to adopt similar behaviours.

Secondly, no group, least of all the IMN should be encouraged to disregard state institutions – statutory or ad-hoc. IMN's decision to boycott the Kaduna State Judicial Commission of Inquiry was wrongly justified on the supposed grounds that they have no confidence in some of its members. This was the same way several publications and commentators actively encouraged the sect's members to stay away from the panel, which has proven to be a mistake as it turned out that the findings are binding on IMN as things stand. They threw away the chance to present their own accounts of events and they cannot now expect the rest of the country to not believe that their boycott has nothing to do with their rejection of a secular state.

The Army, which got its fair share of blame even after appearing with an array of legal experts, now know where to make amends. The Army is a national institution and would never be disbanded to service the interest of any group or organisation even when such entities are known to have active support from foreign donors to constantly make Nigeria look like a basket case. This is one reality we are forced to live with and the best that can happen is to continue pressing for individuals that erred to account for their action but not asking to subvert the Army for IMN.
Furthermore, the trend of condemning decisions taken by state governments in pursuit of safeguarding the rest of the population from the handful of Shiites must be discontinued. States do not have the responsibility to pander to IMN's extreme expectations of being allowed to torment others with obstructive processions with members known to have been militarised. The responsibility is to each an every citizens who have the right of access on public road, the right not to be under constant threats and others.

Newspaper organisations that accept the brief to make IMN's excesses appear like legitimate exercise of their right to free worship, association and expression must as a matter of fairness execute similar briefs for other minorities pro-bono. Such organisations should defend the rights of Ombatse members to slaughter security operatives as part of their expression of religious freedom. They should defend the child burning fanatics who label minors as witches in order to kill them as merely expressing a minority religious view same way they should protect rapist charlatans that hide under the cover of religion. Ritual killers who believe in dismembering other humans to get ingredients for their money making séances are also practicing their faith and would demand protection by the same token. While at it they should not forget that Boko Haram terrorists have never seen themselves as anything but enforcers of a religion in spite of their sick perversions, they too should get the sympathies that would provoke favourable editorials.

On a more serious note, the reality is that we must look beyond the superficial and a mindless sense of vendetta that has driven most of the pro-IMN communication. It is only then that it would become clearer that it is this group that has made Nigeria the enemy and not the other way round. Instead of helping to convey and amplify IMN threats, newspapers that are truly objective and desirous of making a deference should fashion out an enlightenment series targeted at de-radicalisation of those that have been thought to rise up against the secular state.

Abiodun writes from Ibadan, Oyo State.

Islamic Movement in Nigeria
The editorial of any newspaper is a powerful tool. It often gives insight into the position that an organisation takes on crucial national issues and its pronouncements are usually tempered by measured caution to ensure that the newspaper does not lose its credibility or respect among readers. It is equally imperative that editorials take the additional precaution of not been seen to endorse criminal or volatile positions so that the proponents of such do not cite the newspaper as the source of their authority in commission of further crimes.


This understanding was not lost on a respectable online newspaper that published an editorial "Nigeria Must Not Transform The Shiites Into Enemies" on Friday October 21, 2016 in which it tenuously attempted to make a case for the Shiites in Nigeria as typified by the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) to continue undermining the state. The editorial also tried to criminalise not just the Nigerian state but also strategic institutions like the Nigerian Army and the Judicial Commission of Inquiry set up by the Kaduna state government to investigate a deadly IMN-Army clash in December 2015.

Read in isolation, the editorial in question is a wake up call that would challenge even the most obtuse government. The other stories, features and opinion articles that the newspaper had been running in recent times however took the wind out of its official position as the direction of the editorial fits smugly into what has been canvassed by supposedly independent contributors. It therefore oozes of being part of a larger communication campaign that is meant to catalyse particular actions.

Before the entire country becomes enslaved to a vocal minority, it is vital to correct some wrong premises advanced in the recent array of write ups like the editorial. The imperative to correct the misimpressions becomes even more urgent upon the realisation that in this age where researchers rely on internet searches, there is a concert effort to saturate the online servers with wrong information that would in the nearest future be referenced as facts.

When citing recent incidents around the IMN in the course of discussing the need for religious tolerance, protection of minorities and respect for human rights, it is important to resist the temptation to set out portraying the group with its members as victims and the rest of the country as aggressors. The inherent danger in doing this is that the infractions, shortcomings and crimes committed by the militant or extremists wings of the IMN are glossed over and they go away with the impression that they have done no wrong. It becomes more dangerous when other groups or even the moderate elements of the IMN are encouraged to adopt similar behaviours.

Secondly, no group, least of all the IMN should be encouraged to disregard state institutions – statutory or ad-hoc. IMN's decision to boycott the Kaduna State Judicial Commission of Inquiry was wrongly justified on the supposed grounds that they have no confidence in some of its members. This was the same way several publications and commentators actively encouraged the sect's members to stay away from the panel, which has proven to be a mistake as it turned out that the findings are binding on IMN as things stand. They threw away the chance to present their own accounts of events and they cannot now expect the rest of the country to not believe that their boycott has nothing to do with their rejection of a secular state.

The Army, which got its fair share of blame even after appearing with an array of legal experts, now know where to make amends. The Army is a national institution and would never be disbanded to service the interest of any group or organisation even when such entities are known to have active support from foreign donors to constantly make Nigeria look like a basket case. This is one reality we are forced to live with and the best that can happen is to continue pressing for individuals that erred to account for their action but not asking to subvert the Army for IMN.
Furthermore, the trend of condemning decisions taken by state governments in pursuit of safeguarding the rest of the population from the handful of Shiites must be discontinued. States do not have the responsibility to pander to IMN's extreme expectations of being allowed to torment others with obstructive processions with members known to have been militarised. The responsibility is to each an every citizens who have the right of access on public road, the right not to be under constant threats and others.

Newspaper organisations that accept the brief to make IMN's excesses appear like legitimate exercise of their right to free worship, association and expression must as a matter of fairness execute similar briefs for other minorities pro-bono. Such organisations should defend the rights of Ombatse members to slaughter security operatives as part of their expression of religious freedom. They should defend the child burning fanatics who label minors as witches in order to kill them as merely expressing a minority religious view same way they should protect rapist charlatans that hide under the cover of religion. Ritual killers who believe in dismembering other humans to get ingredients for their money making séances are also practicing their faith and would demand protection by the same token. While at it they should not forget that Boko Haram terrorists have never seen themselves as anything but enforcers of a religion in spite of their sick perversions, they too should get the sympathies that would provoke favourable editorials.

On a more serious note, the reality is that we must look beyond the superficial and a mindless sense of vendetta that has driven most of the pro-IMN communication. It is only then that it would become clearer that it is this group that has made Nigeria the enemy and not the other way round. Instead of helping to convey and amplify IMN threats, newspapers that are truly objective and desirous of making a deference should fashion out an enlightenment series targeted at de-radicalisation of those that have been thought to rise up against the secular state.

Abiodun writes from Ibadan, Oyo State.

JCI,NHRC Reports: What Is FG Waiting For? By Anthony Kolawole

JCI,NHRC Reports: What Is FG Waiting For? By Anthony Kolawole

buhari
‘Save Zakzaky’s Life Group of Nigeria’, the new creation of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) has threatened to overwhelm Abuja, the nation’s capital with protests if their leader, Mr Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky is not released from the custody. National Coordinator of the IMN subsidiary, Bashir Marafa hinted that millions would be attending the protests.

As a background, El-Zakyzaky was taken into custody in the aftermath of a military operation in Zaria, Kaduna state after extremists in the IMN made an attempt on the life of the Chief of Army Staff. He reportedly sustained injuries from that operation for which he has been treated. Going by the account of the military, that operation led to the recovery of caches of weapons that could have potentially been enough to destabilize the country.


The operation also led to widespread condemnation because of the human toll reportedly recorded. The consequence of this was the several probes and investigations that were launched in its aftermath. Three reports on the incidence stand out by reason of what they prescribed.

First was the report of Amnesty International, which came out in record time thereby casting doubt on its thoroughness especially when it mostly spoke with the extremists and recourse to the military as a last resort. Its report wants the military punished as it made light of the aggression put up by IMN members.

Secondly is the report of the Kaduna State Judicial Commission of Inquiry that was set up by the Kaduna state governor, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai. That commission found the IMN and its leadership culpable in precipitating the situation that led to the operation. Its recommendation included trying and punishing those that were responsible for instigating the IMN youths to go to war with the army.

Thirdly, the report of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) directly indicted EL-Zakyzaky. The Commission consequently called for the speedy trial of El-Zakzaky after it found that the leadership and members of the sect “were responsible for the abuse of right to freedom of movement of the convoy of the COAS and other members of the public by blocking the public highway on December 12, 2015.”

It is therefore cofounding that the Federal Government is yet to act on any of these reports to take decisive steps that will ensure that Nigerians do not have to live in fear and read of IMN members oppressing them and denying them of their rights on daily basis.

The delay in acting on the recommendations to put El-Zakyzaky and other IMN leaders on trial is that they are now playing reversed psychology game on the state. Instead of retreating as the indicted party, the one in the wrong, they have whipped up propaganda that accuses the Nigerian government and its institutions of being the aggressors.

In total insensitivity and regards for the historical fact that their penchant for terrorizing other citizens with processions that seal off public roads was a factor in the clashes they have had with security agencies, IMN members have take to the streets of major cities in attempt to stage crippling protests. Fortunately, those protests fell flat as the group’s notoriety preceded it. They then resorted to declaring a provocative trek from Zaria to Abuja, which also failed as several critics were quick to point out that the trek could be a cover for wanted IMN fanatics to flee their known location to establish new cells in other cities. They were also reportedly looking to use the trek and its associated protests to trigger a faceoff with security agencies.

This latest threat of grounding Abuja with protests is the latest in the series of baiting that IMN has been involved in to make the federal government and organizations like the police and army look bad. Somewhere in the wing there is Amnesty International waiting, possibly to launch a report that will criminalize any response to the provocative protests.

We should at this point begin to ask ourselves how as a country we got to this point where an extremist group backed by an Islamic country became a law unto itself. We must interrogate why IMN and its leadership have arrogated to themselves the status of not being bound by the laws by which other groups and persons are bound. If we follow the precedence being sought by IMN authorities would have to release any captured Boko Haram commander without trial even though these terrorists and IMN leadership have a lot in common in that they promote extremism, radicalize youths and commit acts of violence against state and citizens alike. By what token are they then demanding that El-Zakyzaky be released?

The fanatical zeal with which they are demanding the release of a man who several reports have recommended for trial lends credence to speculations that some of his followers and backer, Iran are not interested in his wellbeing but only want him released to them so that they can finish him off and then blame his demise on the Nigerian state. The thinking is that as a “martyr” he would be able to provoke an “earth shaking crisis” that his entire vitriolic cannot achieve while in the land of the living. As farfetched as this speculation is, the government must be wary not to make the mistake of caving in to blackmail.

Should El-Zakyzaky be released on the basis of the blackmail protests then it would amount to setting bad precedence that will come back to haunt the nation. Extremists groups will simply proliferate and no one would be able to hold their leaders responsible for anything. The ugly suggestion of the plan by some IMN members with Iran is further proof that everything must continued to be done according to the book – the courts should be allowed to decide the man’s fate in accordance of whatever the government would charge him for and how well the charges are marshaled.

This leaves the federal government with a clear option: they should begin El-Zakzakky's prosecution on the strength of the Kaduna State Judicial Commission of Inquiry and the NHRC reports, which have strongly indicted him.

Kolawole PHD is a University lecturer and contributed this piece from Keffi, Nasarawa State.

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
buhari
‘Save Zakzaky’s Life Group of Nigeria’, the new creation of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) has threatened to overwhelm Abuja, the nation’s capital with protests if their leader, Mr Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky is not released from the custody. National Coordinator of the IMN subsidiary, Bashir Marafa hinted that millions would be attending the protests.

As a background, El-Zakyzaky was taken into custody in the aftermath of a military operation in Zaria, Kaduna state after extremists in the IMN made an attempt on the life of the Chief of Army Staff. He reportedly sustained injuries from that operation for which he has been treated. Going by the account of the military, that operation led to the recovery of caches of weapons that could have potentially been enough to destabilize the country.


The operation also led to widespread condemnation because of the human toll reportedly recorded. The consequence of this was the several probes and investigations that were launched in its aftermath. Three reports on the incidence stand out by reason of what they prescribed.

First was the report of Amnesty International, which came out in record time thereby casting doubt on its thoroughness especially when it mostly spoke with the extremists and recourse to the military as a last resort. Its report wants the military punished as it made light of the aggression put up by IMN members.

Secondly is the report of the Kaduna State Judicial Commission of Inquiry that was set up by the Kaduna state governor, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai. That commission found the IMN and its leadership culpable in precipitating the situation that led to the operation. Its recommendation included trying and punishing those that were responsible for instigating the IMN youths to go to war with the army.

Thirdly, the report of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) directly indicted EL-Zakyzaky. The Commission consequently called for the speedy trial of El-Zakzaky after it found that the leadership and members of the sect “were responsible for the abuse of right to freedom of movement of the convoy of the COAS and other members of the public by blocking the public highway on December 12, 2015.”

It is therefore cofounding that the Federal Government is yet to act on any of these reports to take decisive steps that will ensure that Nigerians do not have to live in fear and read of IMN members oppressing them and denying them of their rights on daily basis.

The delay in acting on the recommendations to put El-Zakyzaky and other IMN leaders on trial is that they are now playing reversed psychology game on the state. Instead of retreating as the indicted party, the one in the wrong, they have whipped up propaganda that accuses the Nigerian government and its institutions of being the aggressors.

In total insensitivity and regards for the historical fact that their penchant for terrorizing other citizens with processions that seal off public roads was a factor in the clashes they have had with security agencies, IMN members have take to the streets of major cities in attempt to stage crippling protests. Fortunately, those protests fell flat as the group’s notoriety preceded it. They then resorted to declaring a provocative trek from Zaria to Abuja, which also failed as several critics were quick to point out that the trek could be a cover for wanted IMN fanatics to flee their known location to establish new cells in other cities. They were also reportedly looking to use the trek and its associated protests to trigger a faceoff with security agencies.

This latest threat of grounding Abuja with protests is the latest in the series of baiting that IMN has been involved in to make the federal government and organizations like the police and army look bad. Somewhere in the wing there is Amnesty International waiting, possibly to launch a report that will criminalize any response to the provocative protests.

We should at this point begin to ask ourselves how as a country we got to this point where an extremist group backed by an Islamic country became a law unto itself. We must interrogate why IMN and its leadership have arrogated to themselves the status of not being bound by the laws by which other groups and persons are bound. If we follow the precedence being sought by IMN authorities would have to release any captured Boko Haram commander without trial even though these terrorists and IMN leadership have a lot in common in that they promote extremism, radicalize youths and commit acts of violence against state and citizens alike. By what token are they then demanding that El-Zakyzaky be released?

The fanatical zeal with which they are demanding the release of a man who several reports have recommended for trial lends credence to speculations that some of his followers and backer, Iran are not interested in his wellbeing but only want him released to them so that they can finish him off and then blame his demise on the Nigerian state. The thinking is that as a “martyr” he would be able to provoke an “earth shaking crisis” that his entire vitriolic cannot achieve while in the land of the living. As farfetched as this speculation is, the government must be wary not to make the mistake of caving in to blackmail.

Should El-Zakyzaky be released on the basis of the blackmail protests then it would amount to setting bad precedence that will come back to haunt the nation. Extremists groups will simply proliferate and no one would be able to hold their leaders responsible for anything. The ugly suggestion of the plan by some IMN members with Iran is further proof that everything must continued to be done according to the book – the courts should be allowed to decide the man’s fate in accordance of whatever the government would charge him for and how well the charges are marshaled.

This leaves the federal government with a clear option: they should begin El-Zakzakky's prosecution on the strength of the Kaduna State Judicial Commission of Inquiry and the NHRC reports, which have strongly indicted him.

Kolawole PHD is a University lecturer and contributed this piece from Keffi, Nasarawa State.

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

Terrorism: Beyond Turkey unto Iran, By Sandra Awulu

Terrorism: Beyond Turkey unto Iran, By Sandra Awulu

Terrorism: Beyond Turkey unto Iran, By Sandra Awulu
It took the dehumanising deportation of Nigerian students for the Federal Government to wake up to the reality that Turkey is not its friend and that whatever they have by way of relationship is borne out of necessity. The Federal Government has now said it would summon the Turkish ambassador to Nigeria, Hakan Cakil, to demand explanation for the deportation of Nigerian students.

The deportations are just one of the daring insults Turkey has heaped on Nigeria since a faction of the Turkish Army attempted to overthrow Recep Tayyip Erdogan earlier in the year. A bellicose Turkey had made accusations that the coup was financed from Nigeria. Its diplomatic indiscretion was to the extent that it requested that the Federal Government shuts down legitimate businesses owned by the Turkish community here on the flawed allegation that the Turkish businessmen who owned these enterprises were part of the coup.


Whatever our anger is over Turkey’s behaviour our real headache is that country’s neighbour to the east, the Islamic Republic of Iran. Where Turkey attempted to mask its actions with some senses of legitimacy, like branding its nationals on our soil as terrorists, Iran totally dispensed with finesse and instead with its preference for outright subversive activities.

It was Iran that has, contrary to international convention, been fuelling the rise of Shia extremism in Nigeria. This was evident in the magnitude of all round support that its former ambassador to Nigeria, Saheed Koozechi offered to the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN). There have been talks that the support included provision firearms and other materials that gave the extremist group an arsenal remarkable enough to embolden them to challenge the Army to battle. The intelligence community would do well to investigate this possibility.

Koozechi, at his prime, was also involved in using Nigeria media to incite insurrection against the secular government. He even infamously alluded to Nigeria pouring fuel on fire because Iran’s proxy and IMN leader, Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky was arrested in the wake of a military operation. Proof that the erstwhile ambassador did not act independently was evident in the other senior administration officials that were making similar calls back in Tehran. Had Koozechi been speaking out of line he would have been recalled earlier than was the case; Iran only recalled him when protests against his continued stay at that post had become a daily affair for Nigerians that are averse to their nation being colonised and structured along sectarian line.

It however turned out that Koozechi’s recall, taken to lull Nigeria into having a false perception of contrition on the part of an unrepentant Iran, was a ploy. His replacement, Ambassador Morteza Rahimi Zarchi was only able to manage a few weeks of calm before he launched into offensive mode. He may think he has sufficiently camouflaged his operations to strengthen Shias above other Nigerians but the tell tale signs are glaring for all to see.

Acting from a manual that could only have been authored in Tehran and implemented by its ambassador, Zarchi has not been able to sufficiently distance himself nor his country from the so called trek by IMN members to Abuja demanding the release of El-Zakyzaky. The trek was a desperate grab at attention after planned protests across several major cities in the north failed to make impact for the mere reason that IMN is known to citizens as the corporate arm of a terror movement. 
It therefore cannot garner the sympathy that Zarchi and Iran desperately need to legitimize their interference.

The frustration from this has driven IMN, which also means the Iranian Embassy, into desperation. The extremists under ‘Save Zakzaky’s Life Group of Nigeria’, citing the expiration of a 14-day ultimatum for the release of El-Zakyzaky, said they would storm Abuja with protests. The euphemism for unleashing their trademark violence should not be lost on anyone as they are not known to be capable of peaceful expression of discontent when spurred by Iranian propaganda and logistics.

The Federal Government must not allow Nigeria to be reduced to this level. It must be decisive in dealing with Iran the same way it has been decisive in dealing with Turkey, for which it brooked no nonsense. Should the infractions of both nations be appropriately weighed it is glaring that Iran has hurt Nigerian interest a thousand fold of anything its neighbour is guilty of. The response must also be commensurate.
Where we are summoning the Turkish Ambassador over the deportation of Nigerian students, we should be severing relations with Iran for importing terrorism into Nigeria and supporting same through its alliance with the IMN. For daring to question Nigeria’s right to ensure its internal security and act against terrorists that country’s ambassador should be expelled.

In addition to expelling Ambassador Morteza Rahimi Zarchi, the Iranian Embassy should be shut indefinitely until that country can commit to deploying its mission in Nigeria without interfering in our internal affairs. If we are firm enough not to accept mistreatment of our citizens from Turkey why should we accept existential threats to our nation from Iran? Anything short of sending Iran out of Nigeria for good would imply that this government is not serious about safeguarding the nation from terrorists.


Awulu, a human rights activist contributed this piece from Washington DC, USA.
Terrorism: Beyond Turkey unto Iran, By Sandra Awulu
It took the dehumanising deportation of Nigerian students for the Federal Government to wake up to the reality that Turkey is not its friend and that whatever they have by way of relationship is borne out of necessity. The Federal Government has now said it would summon the Turkish ambassador to Nigeria, Hakan Cakil, to demand explanation for the deportation of Nigerian students.

The deportations are just one of the daring insults Turkey has heaped on Nigeria since a faction of the Turkish Army attempted to overthrow Recep Tayyip Erdogan earlier in the year. A bellicose Turkey had made accusations that the coup was financed from Nigeria. Its diplomatic indiscretion was to the extent that it requested that the Federal Government shuts down legitimate businesses owned by the Turkish community here on the flawed allegation that the Turkish businessmen who owned these enterprises were part of the coup.


Whatever our anger is over Turkey’s behaviour our real headache is that country’s neighbour to the east, the Islamic Republic of Iran. Where Turkey attempted to mask its actions with some senses of legitimacy, like branding its nationals on our soil as terrorists, Iran totally dispensed with finesse and instead with its preference for outright subversive activities.

It was Iran that has, contrary to international convention, been fuelling the rise of Shia extremism in Nigeria. This was evident in the magnitude of all round support that its former ambassador to Nigeria, Saheed Koozechi offered to the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN). There have been talks that the support included provision firearms and other materials that gave the extremist group an arsenal remarkable enough to embolden them to challenge the Army to battle. The intelligence community would do well to investigate this possibility.

Koozechi, at his prime, was also involved in using Nigeria media to incite insurrection against the secular government. He even infamously alluded to Nigeria pouring fuel on fire because Iran’s proxy and IMN leader, Ibraheem El-Zakyzaky was arrested in the wake of a military operation. Proof that the erstwhile ambassador did not act independently was evident in the other senior administration officials that were making similar calls back in Tehran. Had Koozechi been speaking out of line he would have been recalled earlier than was the case; Iran only recalled him when protests against his continued stay at that post had become a daily affair for Nigerians that are averse to their nation being colonised and structured along sectarian line.

It however turned out that Koozechi’s recall, taken to lull Nigeria into having a false perception of contrition on the part of an unrepentant Iran, was a ploy. His replacement, Ambassador Morteza Rahimi Zarchi was only able to manage a few weeks of calm before he launched into offensive mode. He may think he has sufficiently camouflaged his operations to strengthen Shias above other Nigerians but the tell tale signs are glaring for all to see.

Acting from a manual that could only have been authored in Tehran and implemented by its ambassador, Zarchi has not been able to sufficiently distance himself nor his country from the so called trek by IMN members to Abuja demanding the release of El-Zakyzaky. The trek was a desperate grab at attention after planned protests across several major cities in the north failed to make impact for the mere reason that IMN is known to citizens as the corporate arm of a terror movement. 
It therefore cannot garner the sympathy that Zarchi and Iran desperately need to legitimize their interference.

The frustration from this has driven IMN, which also means the Iranian Embassy, into desperation. The extremists under ‘Save Zakzaky’s Life Group of Nigeria’, citing the expiration of a 14-day ultimatum for the release of El-Zakyzaky, said they would storm Abuja with protests. The euphemism for unleashing their trademark violence should not be lost on anyone as they are not known to be capable of peaceful expression of discontent when spurred by Iranian propaganda and logistics.

The Federal Government must not allow Nigeria to be reduced to this level. It must be decisive in dealing with Iran the same way it has been decisive in dealing with Turkey, for which it brooked no nonsense. Should the infractions of both nations be appropriately weighed it is glaring that Iran has hurt Nigerian interest a thousand fold of anything its neighbour is guilty of. The response must also be commensurate.
Where we are summoning the Turkish Ambassador over the deportation of Nigerian students, we should be severing relations with Iran for importing terrorism into Nigeria and supporting same through its alliance with the IMN. For daring to question Nigeria’s right to ensure its internal security and act against terrorists that country’s ambassador should be expelled.

In addition to expelling Ambassador Morteza Rahimi Zarchi, the Iranian Embassy should be shut indefinitely until that country can commit to deploying its mission in Nigeria without interfering in our internal affairs. If we are firm enough not to accept mistreatment of our citizens from Turkey why should we accept existential threats to our nation from Iran? Anything short of sending Iran out of Nigeria for good would imply that this government is not serious about safeguarding the nation from terrorists.


Awulu, a human rights activist contributed this piece from Washington DC, USA.

Trending

randomposts

Like Us

fb/https://www.facebook.com/newsproof
google.com, pub-6536761625640326, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0